United Realty Advisors, LP et al v. Verschleiser et al
Filing
502
ORDER TO UPDATE THE PARTIES' CONTACT INFORMATION: The Court has reviewed the docket sheets in these matters and notes that they lack complete contact information for pro se defendants Eli Verschleiser, Raul Del Forno, Ophir Pinhasi, and Alexan dru Onica. To rectify this oversight, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court update the docket sheets in the above-referenced matters to reflect the following contact information as it pertains to each defendant. The Court also notes that t he docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084 indicates that plaintiff Jacob Frydman is pro se; however, plaintiff Frydman is currently represented by attorney Neal Brickman. Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court delete plai ntiff Frydman's pro se contact information from the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se defendants Raul Del Forno and Ophir Pinhasi provide their telephone numbers to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). They may do so by mailing a letter with this information, addressed to the Clerk of Court at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the pro se defendants and att orneys of record promptly notify the Court if (1) any of the contact information contained on page 1 of this order is incorrect, and (2) any of their addresses or telephone numbers change. (And as further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman, Sitting by Special Designation on 12/6/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF(jca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED REALTY ADVISORS, LP, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. 14-cv-5903
Civil Action No. 14-cv-8084
vs.
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
ELI VERSCHLEISER, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER TO UPDATE THE PARTIES’ CONTACT INFORMATION
The Court has reviewed the docket sheets in these matters and notes that they lack
complete contact information for pro se defendants Eli Verschleiser, Raul Del Forno, Ophir
Pinhasi, and Alexandru Onica. To rectify this oversight, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
Clerk of Court update the docket sheets in the above-referenced matters to reflect the following
contact information as it pertains to each defendant:
Eli Verschleiser
Address #1:
1820 Avenue M. #718
Brooklyn, NY 11230
Tel.: (212) 742-0707
Email: eli.v@multigroups.com
Raul Del Forno
90 Edgewater Street Apt. 703
Coral Gables, FL 33133
Email: rauldelforno@gmail.com
Ophir Pinhasi
135-34 78th Drive
Flushing, NY 11367
Email: ophir@pinhasi.org
Alexandru Onica
57 Rockwell Place
Brooklyn, NY 11217
Tel.: (917) 767-4044
Email: aonica@daxconcept.com
Address #2:
40 Wall Street, 60th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Tel.: (212) 742-0707
Email: eli.v@multigroups.com
The Court also notes that the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084
indicates that plaintiff Jacob Frydman is pro se; however, plaintiff Frydman is currently
represented by attorney Neal Brickman. Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk
of Court delete plaintiff Frydman’s pro se contact information from the docket sheet for civil
action number 14-cv-8084.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se defendants Raul Del Forno and Ophir
Pinhasi provide their telephone numbers to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). They may do
so by mailing a letter with this information, addressed to the Clerk of Court at the Daniel Patrick
Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the pro se defendants and attorneys of
record promptly notify the Court if (1) any of the contact information contained on page 1 of this
order is incorrect, and (2) any of their addresses or telephone numbers change.
s/Bernard A. Friedman
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION
Dated: December 6, 2019December 6, 2019
Detroit, Michigan
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?