United Realty Advisors, LP et al v. Verschleiser et al

Filing 502

ORDER TO UPDATE THE PARTIES' CONTACT INFORMATION: The Court has reviewed the docket sheets in these matters and notes that they lack complete contact information for pro se defendants Eli Verschleiser, Raul Del Forno, Ophir Pinhasi, and Alexan dru Onica. To rectify this oversight, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court update the docket sheets in the above-referenced matters to reflect the following contact information as it pertains to each defendant. The Court also notes that t he docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084 indicates that plaintiff Jacob Frydman is pro se; however, plaintiff Frydman is currently represented by attorney Neal Brickman. Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court delete plai ntiff Frydman's pro se contact information from the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se defendants Raul Del Forno and Ophir Pinhasi provide their telephone numbers to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). They may do so by mailing a letter with this information, addressed to the Clerk of Court at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the pro se defendants and att orneys of record promptly notify the Court if (1) any of the contact information contained on page 1 of this order is incorrect, and (2) any of their addresses or telephone numbers change. (And as further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Bernard A. Friedman, Sitting by Special Designation on 12/6/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-05903-BAF, 1:14-cv-08084-BAF(jca)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED REALTY ADVISORS, LP, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 14-cv-5903 Civil Action No. 14-cv-8084 vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN ELI VERSCHLEISER, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER TO UPDATE THE PARTIES’ CONTACT INFORMATION The Court has reviewed the docket sheets in these matters and notes that they lack complete contact information for pro se defendants Eli Verschleiser, Raul Del Forno, Ophir Pinhasi, and Alexandru Onica. To rectify this oversight, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court update the docket sheets in the above-referenced matters to reflect the following contact information as it pertains to each defendant: Eli Verschleiser Address #1: 1820 Avenue M. #718 Brooklyn, NY 11230 Tel.: (212) 742-0707 Email: eli.v@multigroups.com Raul Del Forno 90 Edgewater Street Apt. 703 Coral Gables, FL 33133 Email: rauldelforno@gmail.com Ophir Pinhasi 135-34 78th Drive Flushing, NY 11367 Email: ophir@pinhasi.org Alexandru Onica 57 Rockwell Place Brooklyn, NY 11217 Tel.: (917) 767-4044 Email: aonica@daxconcept.com Address #2: 40 Wall Street, 60th Floor New York, NY 10005 Tel.: (212) 742-0707 Email: eli.v@multigroups.com The Court also notes that the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084 indicates that plaintiff Jacob Frydman is pro se; however, plaintiff Frydman is currently represented by attorney Neal Brickman. Therefore, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court delete plaintiff Frydman’s pro se contact information from the docket sheet for civil action number 14-cv-8084. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pro se defendants Raul Del Forno and Ophir Pinhasi provide their telephone numbers to the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). They may do so by mailing a letter with this information, addressed to the Clerk of Court at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the pro se defendants and attorneys of record promptly notify the Court if (1) any of the contact information contained on page 1 of this order is incorrect, and (2) any of their addresses or telephone numbers change. s/Bernard A. Friedman BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION Dated: December 6, 2019December 6, 2019 Detroit, Michigan 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?