Shaffer Smith, 2424, LLC et al v. Foster et al
Filing
36
OPINION & ORDER re: 35 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint and to Suspend the Requirement of a Rule 26(f) Report addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Cynthia S. Arato, Esq. dated February 1 0, 2015 filed by Vernon Brown, V. Brown & Company, Inc., Vernon Brown answer due 3/6/2015; V. Brown & Company, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Vernon Brown and V. Brown & Company, Inc. shall answer or move in response to the second amended complai nt on or before March 6, 2015. If they file a motion to dismiss, any opposition shall be due twenty days later; the reply shall be due fourteen days after the opposition is filed. In light of the automatic stay of discovery pursuant to the Private Se curities Litigation Reform Act, the parties need not submit a joint Rule 26(f) report and discovery plan until the Court resolves defendants' contemplated motion to dismiss. Discovery in the Smith and Citibank actions will therefore proceed independently at this time. SO ORDERED.answer due 3/6/2015.( Motions due by 3/6/2015.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 2/13/2015) (ama)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------!
SHAFFER SMITH, 2424, LCC, SUPER SAYIN' !
!
PUBLISHING, LLC, COMPOUND TOURING, 1
INC., and COMPOUND ENTERTAINMENT, /
LLC,
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#: - - DATE FILED: 02/13/2015
14-Cv-5918 (SHS)
Plaintiffs,
-against-
OPINION &
KEVIN FOSTER, VERNON BROWN, FOSTER
& FIRM, INC., and V. BROWN & COMP ANY,
INC.,
ORDER
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of defendants Vernon Brown and V. Brown & Company,
Inc.'s letter motion dated February 10, 2015. (Dkt. No. 35.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT:
1.
2.
Vernon Brown and V. Brown & Company, Inc. shall answer or move in response
to the second amended complaint on or before March 6, 2015. If they file a motion
to dismiss, any opposition shall be due twenty days later; the reply shall be due
fourteen days after the opposition is filed.
In light of the automatic stay of discovery pursuant to the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act, the parties need not submit a joint Rule 26(f) report and
discovery plan until the Court resolves defendants' contemplated motion to
dismiss. Discovery in the Smith and Citibank actions will therefore proceed
independently at this time.
Dated: New York, New York
February 13, 2015
SOORDEREQY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?