Microban Products Company v. Iskin inc.

Filing 33

OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error, and having found none, it adopts the Report in its entirety. It is thus ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judg ment in favor of Plaintiff in the following amount: (i) damages in the amount of $750,000, representing Plaintiff's actual damages, trebled pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1l17(b); (ii) pre-judgment interest on such damages, from December 3 1, 2013, to the date of entry of judgment, at the interest rate referenced in 26 U.S.C. § 662l(a)(2); (iii) post-judgment interest on such damages, from the date of entry of judgment, at the interest rate referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 1961; (iv) attorneys' fees in the amount of $21,659.10; and (v) costs in the amount of $1,094.45. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/18/2016) (cf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED: 8/18/2016 MICROBAN PRODUCTS COMPANY Plaintiff, No. 14-CV-05980 (RA) OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION v. ISKIN, INC., Defendant. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Microban Products Company brought federal trademark claims and various statelaw claims against Defendant iSkin Inc. Following the entry of a default judgment against iSkin, see Dkt. 24, the Court referred the calculation of damages to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman, see Dkt. 26. On February 23, 2016, Judge Freeman issued a 41-page Report and Recommendation (the "Report") detailing damages calculations and recommending the extent of damages to which Microban is entitled. See Dkt. 31. The Court has received no objections to the Report. A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Parties may object to a magistrate judge's recommended findings "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b )(2). "A court may accept those portions of a report to which no specific, written objection is made, as long as the factual and legal bases supporting the findings are not clearly erroneous." Stevens v. Griffin, No. 13-CV-5170 (RJS), 2016 WL 3670825, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 5, 2016). The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error, and having found none, it adopts the Report in its entirety. It is thus ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff in the following amount: (i) damages in the amount of $750,000, representing Plaintiffs actual damages, trebled pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1l17(b); (ii) pre-judgment interest on such damages, from December 31, 2013, to the date of entry of judgment, at the interest rate referenced in 26 U.S.C. § 662l(a)(2); (iii) post-judgment interest on such damages, from the date of entry of judgment, at the interest rate referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 1961; (iv) attorneys' fees in the amount of $21,659.10; and (v) costs in the amount of $1,094.45. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2016 New York, New York · Abrams ited States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?