Moreno-Godoy v. Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, L.L.P. et al

Filing 193

ORDER: Barring settlement, the case will now proceed to trial. Before the Court can set a trial date a process which, pursuant to the District's COVID-19 protocols, entails centralized scheduling of jury trial dates the Court will need to confer with counsel about, inter alia, the availability of the parties, counsel, and necessary witnesses. For this purpose, the Court needs to ascertain which counsel will representing Moreno-Godoy at trial. Moreno-Godoy filed his complaint pro se, Dkt. 1, but on December 1, 2015, able pro bono counsel entered their notices of appearance on behalf of Moreno Godoy and thereafter represented him in this Court, Dkt. 67, 68, and separate pro bono counsel appeared for him on the recent appe al, see Dkt. 192. The Court directs both sets of plaintiffs' counsel to promptly confer, among themselves and with Moreno-Godoy, and by Friday, August 6, 2021, to submit a joint letter addressing whether either is or both are available and cl ient-approved to represent Moreno-Godoy at trial. Following receipt of this letter, the Court will determine next steps, including whether to seek to secure a jury trial date for the fourth quarter of 2021, as to which applications by the Court are due on August 15, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/30/2021) (va)

Download PDF
Case 1:14-cv-07082-PAE-RWL Document 193 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LUIS FELIPE MORENO-GODOY, -v- Plaintiff, 14 Civ. 7082 (PAE) ORDER GALLET DREYER & BERKEY, LLP et al., Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On April 11, 2019, this Court granted defendants’ motions in limine and motions for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiff Luis Felipe Moreno-Godoy’s remaining claims. Dkt. 189. Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the grants of summary judgment and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Dkt. 192. Barring settlement, the case will now proceed to trial. Before the Court can set a trial date – a process which, pursuant to the District’s COVID-19 protocols, entails centralized scheduling of jury trial dates – the Court will need to confer with counsel about, inter alia, the availability of the parties, counsel, and necessary witnesses. For this purpose, the Court needs to ascertain which counsel will representing Moreno-Godoy at trial. Moreno-Godoy filed his complaint pro se, Dkt. 1, but on December 1, 2015, able pro bono counsel entered their notices of appearance on behalf of Moreno Godoy and thereafter represented him in this Court, Dkt. 67, 68, and separate pro bono counsel appeared for him on the recent appeal, see Dkt. 192. The Court directs both sets of plaintiffs’ counsel to promptly confer, among themselves and with Moreno-Godoy, and by Friday, August 6, 2021, to submit a joint letter addressing whether either is or both are available and client-approved to represent Moreno-Godoy at trial. Following 1 Case 1:14-cv-07082-PAE-RWL Document 193 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 2 receipt of this letter, the Court will determine next steps, including whether to seek to secure a jury trial date for the fourth quarter of 2021, as to which applications by the Court are due on August 15, 2021. SO ORDERED. PaJA.� ____________________________ Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Dated: July 30, 2021 New York, New York 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?