Jeanty v. MRS BPO, LLC

Filing 18

ORDER. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on December 31, 2014) (Woods, Gregory)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X : HARRY JEANTY, : : Plaintiff(s), : : -v : : MRS BPO, LLC, : : Defendant(s). : : ----------------------------------------------------------------- X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 12/31/14 1:14-cv-8312-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: The Court ordered that an initial conference be held in this matter on December 2, 2014. Only defendant appeared at the conference; plaintiff did not appear. On December 4, 2014, the Court issued an order setting a conference for December 22, 2014, and, as a result of plaintiff’s failure to appear at the first Court-ordered conference, specifically stated that failure to obey the Court’s scheduling orders and to appear at the conference may result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f), including the dismissal of this case. The December 22, 2014 conference was held as scheduled; plaintiff again failed to appear. On December 22, 2014, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause by December 29, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 16(f). To date, plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order to show cause. Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 16(f) for plaintiff’s repeated failure to obey the Court’s orders and to appear at the Court’s scheduled conferences in this matter. Defendant is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff and to file proof of service with the Court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 31, 2014 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?