Datta v. USA

Filing 64

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on SECTION 5 U.S.C. 552 (a) MOTION TO CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE HARD COPY OF THE COUNTS/INDICTMENT WITH CASE NUMBER IN WHICH IMPRISONMENT AND FORFEITURE ORDERS WERE IMPOSED IN SENTENCING ON VIKRAM DATTA ON 1/20/2012. denying 63 Motion re: 63 MOTION SECTION 5:552(a) MOTION TO CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE HARD COPY OF THE COUNTS/INDICTMENT WITH CASE NUMBER IN WHICH IMPRISONMENT & FORFEITURE ORDERS WERE IMPOSED IN SENTENCING ON VIKRAM DATTA ON 1/20/12. ENDORSEMENT: As this Court wrote on 8/5/21, defendant may request copies of publicly available documents from the clerk upon payment of any required fees. The Court lacks jurisdiction to grant any relief under USC 552 for the captioned matters. Denied.. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 10/5/2021) (ks)

~ase 1:14-cv-08653-LAK Document 63 Filed 09/23/21 Page 1 of 13
LJr.:- t"'EI'' I.: i..l
' ~ ti., .......

r\

MEMO ENDORSED

!_

"'

SONY PRO SE OFF/t r
?Mf (J;'f,l; ,.,,

'-' .•

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTf't5RvtHl:>i AM
r.., =- .,.~===--SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (S1

~~ct:~~
~

fO: 25

-·-----

~

E LECTRONJCALi.Y F!LED

oocµ;

VIKRAM DATTA

DATE

PETITIONER.

V.

Frr-io: ( ' -

,,-

...5?eft

Case# 1:11-MJ-108; 1:11-CR-0102; 1:11-CR-0102-1 {LAK);
14-cv-8653(LAK): 1:20-cv-02330-LAK.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RESPONDENT.
SECTION 5 U.S.C. 552 {a) MOTION TO CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE HARD COPY OF
THE COUNTS/INDICTMENT WITH CASE NUMBER IN WHICH IMPRISONMENT AND
FORFEITURE ORDERS WERE IMPOSED IN SENTENCING ON VIKRAM DATTA ON
1/20/2012.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
COMES NOW, I, VIKRAM DATTA, prose, hereafter 'PETITIONER' moves the Honorable Court with
this 'Section 5 U.S.C 552(a} Motion To Clarify and provide the hard copy of the Counts/Indictment w ith
Case Number in which Imprisonment, and Forfeiture Orders were Imposed in Sentencing on Vikram
Datta on 1/20/2012. Petitioner does not know in which counts/indictments from which case number,
the Imprisonment and Forfeiture orders for $40,000,000 in Count One, and $29,505,265 in Counts Two
and Three we re imposed on to him. Petitioner respectfully states following in support:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Petitioner respectfully requests the Hono rable Court to construe prose pleadings of petitioner
liberally. Please see Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), Walker v. Schu ltz, 727 F. 3d 119 (2 nd