Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thompson et al

Filing 155

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JAY FUNG: IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $1,766,083.00, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together wi th prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $244,308.00, for a total of $2,010,391.00, provided, however, that this disgorgement and prejudgment interest award shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the restitution order in People o f the State of New York against Anthony Thompson et al., Indictment No. 03853/2014 (Supreme Court, New York County). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other jud gment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/30/2020) (nb) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

Download PDF
Case 1:14-cv-09126-ALC Document 155 Filed 12/30/20 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 12/30/2020 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. 14 Civ. 9126 (ALC) ANTHONY J. THOMPSON Jr., JAY FUNG, and ERIC VAN NGUYEN, Defendants, JOHN BABIKIAN and KENDALL THOMPSON, Relief Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JAY FUNG The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Jay Fung having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(b)] by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security 1 Case 1:14-cv-09126-ALC Document 148 Filed 12/23/20 Page 2 of 3 155 12/30/20 for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $1,766,083.00, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $244,308.00, for a total of $2,010,391.00, provided, however, that this disgorgement and prejudgment interest award shall be deemed satisfied by the entry of the restitution order in People of the State of New York against Anthony Thompson et al., Indictment No. 03853/2014 (Supreme Court, New York County). III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. 2 Case 1:14-cv-09126-ALC Document 148 Filed 12/23/20 Page 3 of 3 155 12/30/20 IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendant of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(19). V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VI. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. December 30 2020 Dated: ______________, _____ ____________________________________ HONORABLE ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?