Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited v. The Trizetto Group, Inc. et al

Filing 622

ORDER re: 615 MOTION to Correct Judgment re: 608 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited, Syntel, Inc. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' unopposed motion is GRANTED. The inadvertently omitted references neither alter the original meaning of the Opinion & Order nor correct a legal or factual error. An Amended Opinion and Order will follow separately under seal. A redacted public version of the Amended Opinion and Order will also issue, consistent with the redactions granted by the Order at Dkt. No. 612. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 615. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/20/2020) (va)

Case 1:15-cv-00211-LGS-SDA Document 622 Filed 04/20/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES MAURITIUS
:
LIMITED, ET AL.,
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
-against:
:
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, ET AL.,
:
Defendants.
:
:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- X

15 Civ. 211 (LGS)
ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion to correct the Opinion & Order, dated March
24, 2020, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) (Dkt. No. 615);
WHEREAS, Rule 60(a) provides that a court “may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising
from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). Rule 60(a) applies only to “changes that implement the result intended by the
court at the time the order was entered,” and it does not permit “changes that alter the original meaning
to correct a legal or factual error.” Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc., 182 F.3d 144, 150–51 (2nd Cir.
1999);
WHEREAS, the Opinion & Order adopted in full Judge Aaron’s Report and Recommendation
(the “Report”) on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment on January 27, 2020.
WHEREAS, the Opinion & Order inadvertently omitted references to a surviving claim that was
not dismissed in the Report. It is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion is GRANTED. The inadvertently omitted
references neither alter the original meaning of the Opinion & Order nor correct a legal or factual error.

Case 1:15-cv-00211-LGS-SDA Document 622 Filed 04/20/20 Page 2 of 2

An Amended Opinion and Order will follow separately under seal. A redacted public version of
the Amended Opinion and Order will also issue, consistent with the redactions granted by the Order at
Dkt. No. 612.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 615.
Dated: April 20, 2020
New York, New York

2