Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited v. The Trizetto Group, Inc. et al
Filing
868
ORDER denying 744 Motion in Limine: It is hereby ORDERED that Syntel's motion in limine No. 11 as to the admissibility of the "Facets Data Dictionary Guide" and the "Facets 5.01 Physical Package Document" is DENIED. The su pplemental declaration adequately provides the business record foundation for the admissibility of the two documents pursuant to Rule 803(6)(D). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 744. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/8/2020) (jwh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:
SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES
:
:
MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al.,
:
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, :
:
-against:
:
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, et al.,
:
:
Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. :
------------------------------------------------------------ X
15 Civ. 211 (LGS)
ORDER
(Plaintiffs’ MIL 11)
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius
Limited and Syntel, Inc. (together, “Syntel”) move in limine (Dkt. No. 744) to preclude the
Facets documentation Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs The TriZetto Group, Inc. and
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (“Defendants”) relied on in opposition to Syntel’s
summary judgment motion regarding the Data Dictionary because it does not constitute business
records under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6);
WHEREAS, by Order dated September 30, 2020, Defendants were directed to file either
(a) a certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6)(D) to provide the business record
foundation for the admissibility of the two documents if they are to be used for the truth of the
matter asserted in the documents, or (b) a letter explaining why such certification is unnecessary;
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2020, Defendants filed the Declaration of Charles Sanders
(Dkt. No. 859). It is hereby
ORDERED that Syntel’s motion in limine No. 11 as to the admissibility of the “Facets
Data Dictionary Guide” and the “Facets 5.01 Physical Package Document” is DENIED. The
supplemental declaration adequately provides the business record foundation for the
admissibility of the two documents pursuant to Rule 803(6)(D).
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 744.
Dated: October 8, 2020
New York, New York
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?