Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited v. The Trizetto Group, Inc. et al
Filing
923
ORDER: It is ORDERED that for reasons that will be explained at a convenient time at trial: 1. Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited and Syntel, Inc.'s application to admit PTX 1530 - 1533, 1535, 1537 - 3539, into evidence or as demonstrative aids (Dkt. No. 918) is DENIED. 2. Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs The TriZetto Group, Inc. and Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s application to admit into evidence documents to show that these exh ibits and the documents shown at trial were pirated (Dkt. No. 920) is also DENIED. Counsel are cautioned that the statements of counsel not adopted by the witness (in this instance Mr. Bergeron during his cross-examination about the Google search) are not evidence and should not be referred to in closing argument. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 10/24/2020) (ama)
<![CDATA[
Case 1:15-cv-00211-LGS-SDA Document 923 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:
SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES
:
MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, :
:
-against:
:
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, et al.,
:
:
Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. :
------------------------------------------------------------ X
15 Civ. 211 (LGS)
ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
It is ORDERED that for reasons that will be explained at a convenient time at trial:
1. Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited and
Syntel, Inc.’s application to admit PTX 1530 - 1533, 1535, 1537 - 3539, into evidence or
as demonstrative aids (Dkt. No. 918) is DENIED.
2. Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs The TriZetto Group, Inc. and Cognizant Technology
Solutions Corp.’s application to admit into evidence documents to show that these
exhibits and the documents shown at trial were pirated (Dkt. No. 920) is also DENIED.
Counsel are cautioned that the statements of counsel not adopted by the witness (in this
instance Mr. Bergeron during his cross-examination about the Google search) are not evidence
and should not be referred to in closing argument.
Dated: October 24, 2020
New York, New York
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
