Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited v. The Trizetto Group, Inc. et al

Filing 934

ORDER re: 932 Letter filed by Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited, Syntel, Inc.. For the reasons stated at the conference, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint letter by November 6, 2020, proposing a revised cr oss-motion briefing schedule -- contemplating four briefs total and reasonable page limits -- along with a plan for any issues that remain to be tried. The letter should also inform the Court of any agreement on (i) holding the motions for attorneys' fees in abeyance and (ii) interim measures prior to the adjudication of any motion for permanent injunction. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/3/2020) (kv)

Download PDF
Case 1:15-cv-00211-LGS-SDA Document 934 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES : MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : -against: : THE TRIZETTO GROUP, et al., : Defendants. : : ------------------------------------------------------------ X 15 Civ. 211 (LGS) ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, a status conference was held on November 2, 2020, to discuss the parties’ submission at Dkt. No. 932. For the reasons stated at the conference, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint letter by November 6, 2020, proposing a revised cross-motion briefing schedule -- contemplating four briefs total and reasonable page limits -- along with a plan for any issues that remain to be tried. The letter should also inform the Court of any agreement on (i) holding the motions for attorneys’ fees in abeyance and (ii) interim measures prior to the adjudication of any motion for permanent injunction. Dated: November 3, 2020 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?