Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Limited v. The Trizetto Group, Inc. et al

Filing 940

ORDER: ORDERED that the parties shall brief their proposed post-trial motions -- which include Syntel's motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial or remittitur, Syntel's proposal that the Court make further findings on its equitable defenses of laches and unclean hands, TriZetto's motions for a permanent injunction and for pre- and post-judgment interest, and TriZetto's unclean hands defense -- according to the following schedule: Motions due by 12/4/2020., Responses due by 1/29/2021, Replies due by 2/9/2021. No party shall exceed seventy-five (75) pages of briefing in total. The parties shall email a courtesy copy of their memoranda of law with hyperlinks to Westlaw for any cited cases and hyperlinks to any cited exhibits and testimony from the record. The parties shall otherwise comply with the Court's Individual Rules, and if in effect, the Emergency Individual Rules andPractices in light of COVID-19. It is further ORDERED that per the parties' agreement, any motion for attorneys' fees will be filed and briefed following entry of a final judgment on appeal. It is further ORDERED that by November 13, 2020, the parties shall file a letter providing an update regarding potential agreements for interim measures prior to adjudication of TriZetto's motion for a permanent injunction. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/09/2020) (ama)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
:
SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES
:
MAURITIUS LIMITED, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, :
:
:
-against:
THE TRIZETTO GROUP, et al.,
:
:
Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs. :
------------------------------------------------------------ X

15 Civ. 211 (LGS)
ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge:
WHEREAS, per the Order at Dkt. No. 934, the parties filed a letter providing a proposed
cross-motion briefing schedule and their respective positions regarding motions for attorneys’
fees, interim measures prior to the adjudication of any motion for permanent injunction and
outstanding issues that remain to be tried (Dkt. No. 937). It is hereby
ORDERED that the parties shall brief their proposed post-trial motions -- which include
Syntel’s motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial or remittitur,
Syntel’s proposal that the Court make further findings on its equitable defenses of laches and
unclean hands, TriZetto’s motions for a permanent injunction and for pre- and post-judgment
interest, and TriZetto’s unclean hands defense -- according to the following schedule:
•

Syntel’s Opening Brief: Friday, December 4, 2020

•

TriZetto’s Opening/Responsive Brief: Tuesday, January 5, 2021

•

Syntel’s Responsive/Reply Brief: Friday, January 29, 2021

•

TriZetto’s Reply Brief: Tuesday, February 9, 2021

No party shall exceed seventy-five (75) pages of briefing in total. The parties shall email
a courtesy copy of their memoranda of law with hyperlinks to Westlaw for any cited cases and
hyperlinks to any cited exhibits and testimony from the record. The parties shall otherwise
comply with the Court’s Individual Rules, and if in effect, the Emergency Individual Rules and
Practices in light of COVID-19. It is further
ORDERED that per the parties’ agreement, any motion for attorneys’ fees will be filed
and briefed following entry of a final judgment on appeal. It is further
ORDERED that by November 13, 2020, the parties shall file a letter providing an
update regarding potential agreements for interim measures prior to adjudication of TriZetto’s
motion for a permanent injunction.

Dated: November 9, 2020
New York, New York

2