Infinity Headwear & Apparel v. Jay Franco & Sons et al
Filing 300
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has made clear that the PTAB reexamination has no consequence on this case until after a reexamination certificate is issued and published. (Doc. Nos. 187 at 6, 260 at 2.) Infinity's motions for summary judgment are fully briefed and discovery is now closed. (See Doc. 190-92, 194, 199, 216-18, 233, 257-59,266-67, 292-93, 296) At this point in the litigation, a stay is unwarranted. After the resolution of the pending motions, the Honorable J. Paul Oetken will determine if the case is ready to proceed to trial. It is hereby ordered that Jay Franco's request to stay the patent infringement cause of action is DENIED. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 6/9/2017) (js)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
