Sklodowska-Grezak v. Stein et al

Filing 99

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #107053 re: 96 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 94 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Grazyna Sklodowska-Grezak. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 96. The Court has also entered a separate Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/20/2017) (cf) Modified on 2/21/2017 (ap).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
────────────────────────────────────
GRAZYNA SKLOWDOWSKA-GREZAK,
15-cv-1670
Plaintiff,
- against JUDITH A. STEIN, PH.D, ET AL.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER

Defendants.
────────────────────────────────────
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The Court has received the plaintiff’s motion for
reconsideration, ECF No. 96.
“The standard for granting [a motion for reconsideration]
is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless
the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that
the court overlooked.” Shrader v. CSX Trasp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255,
257 (2d Cir. 1995). The plaintiff has failed to make such a
showing, and has not pointed to any information that “might
reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the
court.” Id.
The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is
directed to close ECF No. 96. The Court has also entered a
separate Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:

New York, New York
February 20, 2017

/s/___________________________
John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge