Arshad v. Transportation Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 70

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 69 Order on Motion to Confirm Arbitration in favor of Muhammad Arshad against Blue Line Corporate Car, Executive Transportation Group Ltd., Love Corporate Car Inc., Love Limousine NYC, LTD d/b/a Blue Line, Love Limous ine NYC, Ltd, Transportation Systems, Inc., Fred Solomon, Haider "Wally&quo Haidere, Jeffrey Acierno, John Acierno in the amount of $5,903.24. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated March 27, 2023, the Court has rejected petitioner's application for an award of attorney's fees and costs. Further, the Court has confirmed the unopposed arbitration award in the sum of $5,750 plus statutory interest in the amount of $153.24; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/28/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

Download PDF
Case 1:15-cv-02138-NRB Document 70 Filed 03/28/23 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X MUHAMMAD ARSHAD, -against- Petitioner, 15 CIVIL 2138 (NRB) JUDGMENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.; EXECUTIVE TRANSPORTATION GROUP LTD.; LOVE LIMOUSINE NYC, LTD, d/b/a BLUE LINE; JOHN ACIERNO; JEFFREY ACIERNO; FRED SOLOMON; and HAIDER “WALLY” HAIDERE, Respondent. -----------------------------------------------------------X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum and Order dated March 27, 2023, the Court has rejected petitioner's application for an award of attorney's fees and costs. Further, the Court has confirmed the unopposed arbitration award in the sum of $5,750 plus statutory interest in the amount of $153.24; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 28, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK _________________________ Clerk of Court BY: _________________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?