Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U. et al v. Argentine Republic et al
Filing
249
ORDER: In its November 23, 2020 Order, the Court directed the parties to confer and propose a briefing schedule on the applicability of privilege, if any, under Spanish law. To the extent that Plaintiffs still assert that such a privilege applies in this litigation, the parties shall confer and propose a briefing schedule on this issue. Additionally, to the extent that Plaintiffs still assert privilege based on a litigation funding arrangement with non-parties, the parties shall confer and propose a briefing schedule on this issue. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/22/2020) (va)
Case 1:15-cv-02739-LAP Document 249 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PETERSEN ENERGÍA INVERSORA,
S.A.U. and PETERSON ENERGÍA,
S.A.U.,
Plaintiffs,
15 Civ. 2739 (LAP)
-againstARGENTINE REPUBLIC and YPF
S.A.,
Defendants.
ETON PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,
L.P. et al.,
Plaintiffs,
16 Civ. 8569 (LAP)
-against-
ORDER
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC and YPF
S.A.,
Defendants.
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge:
In its November 23, 2020 Order, the Court directed the
parties to confer and propose a briefing schedule on the
applicability of privilege, if any, under Spanish law.
To the
extent that Plaintiffs still assert that such a privilege
applies in this litigation, the parties shall confer and propose
a briefing schedule on this issue.
Additionally, to the extent
that Plaintiffs still assert privilege based on a litigation
1
Case 1:15-cv-02739-LAP Document 249 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2
funding arrangement with non-parties, the parties shall confer
and propose a briefing schedule on this issue.
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
New York, New York
December 22, 2020
__________________________________
LORETTA A. PRESKA
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?