Wiggins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
44
ORDER for 36 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Denise Wiggins, 43 Report and Recommendations. Before me is Judge Fox's August 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 43), 11/10/2016 which recommends that Plaintiff's m otion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the ALJ'sdecision be reversed and the case remanded, and Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. (As further set forth in this Order.) Here, although the Report and Recommendation provided that the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the service of this Report to file written objections," (Report and Recommendation 15), neither party has filed an objection. I have reviewed Judge Fox's thorough and well-reasoned Repor t and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review, find none. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Judgment on the pleadings is granted in favor of Plaintiff, the ALJ's decision is reversed, and this c ase is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerks Office is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions, and to enter judgment remanding this case. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/10/2016) (cf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------- X
:
DENISE WIGGINS,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
- against :
:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, :
:
Defendant. :
:
-------------------------------------------------------- X
11/10/2016
15-CV-2895 (VSB) (KNF)
ORDER
Appearances:
Christopher James Bowes
Center for Disability Advocacy Rights, Inc.
New York, New York
Counsel for Plaintiff
Brandon Herbert Cowart
John E. Gura, Jr.
U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
New York, New York
Counsel for Defendant
VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Denise Wiggins brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of an administrative law judge’s
(“ALJ”) decision, dated January 6, 2015, finding her ineligible for disability insurance benefits.
On January 21, 2016, Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. 26.) On February 16,
2016, Plaintiff cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 36.) This case was referred to
Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox for a report and recommendation on the cross-motions.
(Doc. 7.) Before me is Judge Fox’s August 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 43),
which recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the ALJ’s
decision be reversed and the case remanded, and Defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “To accept the report
and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Nelson v.
Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y.1985).
Here, although the Report and Recommendation provided that “the parties shall have
fourteen (14) days from the service of this Report to file written objections,” (Report and
Recommendation 15), neither party has filed an objection. I have reviewed Judge Fox’s
thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful
review, find none. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Judgment on the pleadings is granted in favor of Plaintiff, the ALJ’s decision is reversed,
and this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings
consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
The Clerk’s Office is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions, and to enter
judgment remanding this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2016
New York, New York
______________________
Vernon S. Broderick
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?