Wiggins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 44

ORDER for 36 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Denise Wiggins, 43 Report and Recommendations. Before me is Judge Fox's August 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 43), 11/10/2016 which recommends that Plaintiff's m otion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the ALJ'sdecision be reversed and the case remanded, and Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. (As further set forth in this Order.) Here, although the Report and Recommendation provided that the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the service of this Report to file written objections," (Report and Recommendation 15), neither party has filed an objection. I have reviewed Judge Fox's thorough and well-reasoned Repor t and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review, find none. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Judgment on the pleadings is granted in favor of Plaintiff, the ALJ's decision is reversed, and this c ase is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerks Office is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions, and to enter judgment remanding this case. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/10/2016) (cf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------- X : DENISE WIGGINS, : : Plaintiff, : : - against : : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, : : Defendant. : : -------------------------------------------------------- X 11/10/2016 15-CV-2895 (VSB) (KNF) ORDER Appearances: Christopher James Bowes Center for Disability Advocacy Rights, Inc. New York, New York Counsel for Plaintiff Brandon Herbert Cowart John E. Gura, Jr. U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York New York, New York Counsel for Defendant VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Denise Wiggins brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision, dated January 6, 2015, finding her ineligible for disability insurance benefits. On January 21, 2016, Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. (Doc. 26.) On February 16, 2016, Plaintiff cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 36.) This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox for a report and recommendation on the cross-motions. (Doc. 7.) Before me is Judge Fox’s August 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 43), which recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the ALJ’s decision be reversed and the case remanded, and Defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y.1985). Here, although the Report and Recommendation provided that “the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the service of this Report to file written objections,” (Report and Recommendation 15), neither party has filed an objection. I have reviewed Judge Fox’s thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation for clear error and, after careful review, find none. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Judgment on the pleadings is granted in favor of Plaintiff, the ALJ’s decision is reversed, and this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk’s Office is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions, and to enter judgment remanding this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2016 New York, New York ______________________ Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?