Filpo v. City of New York et al

Filing 22

OPINION AND ORDER. On December 15, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 21.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend but warned that if Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint within sixty days of the Court&# 039;s Opinion and Order, the dismissal would be with prejudice and the case would be closed. More than sixty days have elapsed and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the dismissal is with prejudice and the case is closed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. The following deadline(s) was terminated: Answer Due Date. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/22/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
FELIX FILPO,
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
-v:
:
CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
:
Defendants. :
:
-------------------------------------------------------------- X

15-CV-3136 (JPO)
OPINION AND ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
On December 15, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 21.)
The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend but warned that if Plaintiff failed to file an amended
complaint within sixty days of the Court’s Opinion and Order, the dismissal would be with
prejudice and the case would be closed. More than sixty days have elapsed and Plaintiff has
failed to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the dismissal is with prejudice and the case is
closed.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 22, 2017
New York, New York
____________________________________
J. PAUL OETKEN
United States District Judge
COPY MAILED TO PRO SE PARTY BY CHAMBERS