Au New Haven, LLC et al v. YKK Corporation

Filing 913

ORDER terminating 886 Motion to Address Admissibility Issues with Certain of Plaintiffs' Exhibits for the High End Outerwear Trial re: 886 MOTION to Address Admissibility Issues with Certain of Plaintiffs' Exhibits for the High End Outerwear Trial ., 905 MOTION for Reconsideration of the 1/13/23, Ruling on YKK's New Definition of "High End Outerwear"., 912 MOTION on the Inadmissibility of Certain Portions of Michael Blunt' ;s Deposition Testimony . ; denying 905 Motion for Reconsideration re 886 MOTION to Address Admissibility Issues with Certain of Plaintiffs' Exhibits for the High End Outerwear Trial . filed by YKK Vietnam Co., Lt d., YKK (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Dalian YKK Zipper Co., Ltd., YKK Austria GMBH, YKK Korea Co., Ltd., YKK Fastening Products Sales Inc., YKK Bangladesh Pte. Ltd., YKK France Sarl, YKK Hong Kong Ltd., P.T. YKK Zipper Indonesia, Shangha i YKK Zipper Co., Ltd., Shanghai YKK Trading Co. Ltd., YKK Canada, YKK (U.S.A.) Inc., YKK Metal Ve Plastik Urunleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S., YKK Zipper (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., YKK Taiwan Co., Ltd, YKK Italia S.P.A., OOO YKK a/k/a YKK Rus sia, YKK (UK) Ltd., YKK Corporation, YKK Canada Inc., YKK Deutschland GMBH, 905 MOTION for Reconsideration of the 1/13/23, Ruling on YKK's New Definition of "High End Outerwear". filed by Trelleborg Coated Sys tems US, Inc., Au New Haven, LLC, 912 MOTION on the Inadmissibility of Certain Portions of Michael Blunt's Deposition Testimony . filed by YKK Vietnam Co., Ltd., YKK (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Dalian YKK Zipper Co., Ltd., YK K Austria GMBH, YKK Korea Co., Ltd., YKK Bangladesh Pte. Ltd., YKK Fastening Products Sales Inc., YKK France Sarl, YKK Hong Kong Ltd., P.T. YKK Zipper Indonesia, YKK Canada, Shanghai YKK Trading Co. Ltd., Shanghai YKK Zipper Co., Lt d., YKK (U.S.A.) Inc., YKK Metal Ve Plastik Urunleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S., YKK Zipper (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., YKK Taiwan Co., Ltd, YKK Italia S.P.A., OOO YKK a/k/a YKK Russia, YKK (UK) Ltd., YKK Corporation, YKK Canada Inc., YKK D eutschland GMBH ; denying 912 Motion re: 886 MOTION to Address Admissibility Issues with Certain of Plaintiffs' Exhibits for the High End Outerwear Trial ., 905 MOTION for Reconsideration of the 1/13/23, Ruling on YKK's New Definition of "High End Outerwear"., 912 MOTION on the Inadmissibility of Certain Portions of Michael Blunt's Deposition Testimony . Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of the Court's ruling concerning Defendants' definition of high end outerwear, see Dkt. No. 905, is denied, and (2) Defendants' motion concerning the inadmissibility of certain portions of Mr. Blunt's testimony, see Dkt. No. 912, is denied. Further , the Court hereby orders Plaintiffs to include the part of Mr. Press's testimony identified by Defendants in the letter at Dkt. No. 911 as part of Plaintiffs' case-in-chief video presentation. Finally, the motion pending at Dkt. No. 886 is terminated; as the Court has begun to do and will do throughout trial, the Court will continue to resolve the admissibility of the exhibits mentioned in this document individually. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 886, 905, and 912. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/23/23) (yv)

Case 1:15-cv-03411-GHW-SN Document 913 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
AU NEW HAVEN, LLC, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs, :
:
-v :
:
YKK CORPORATION, et al.,
:
:
Defendant(s). :
:
----------------------------------------------------------------- X
GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #: _________________
DATE FILED: 1/23/2023

1:15-cv-3411-GHW
ORDER

For the reasons stated on the record on January 23, 2023: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for
reconsideration of the Court’s ruling concerning Defendants’ definition of high end outerwear, see
Dkt. No. 905, is denied, and (2) Defendants’ motion concerning the inadmissibility of certain
portions of Mr. Blunt’s testimony, see Dkt. No. 912, is denied. Further, the Court hereby orders
Plaintiffs to include the part of Mr. Press’s testimony identified by Defendants in the letter at Dkt.
No. 911 as part of Plaintiffs’ case-in-chief video presentation. Finally, the motion pending at Dkt.
No. 886 is terminated; as the Court has begun to do and will do throughout trial, the Court will
continue to resolve the admissibility of the exhibits mentioned in this document individually.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 886, 905, and
912.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 23, 2023
New York, New York

__________________________________
GREGORY H. WOODS
United States District Judge