Au New Haven, LLC et al v. YKK Corporation

Filing 987

ORDER: The Court thanks the parties for their submissions in advance of the July 31, 2023 trial. See Dkt. Nos. 982984. Through this order, the Court requests the filing of several additional documents and alters the deadline for the submission of o ne set of materials. First, the Court previously ordered the parties to file their "unredacted Daubert moving papers and exhibits, unredacted Daubert opposition papers and exhibits, and unredacted Daubert reply papers and exhibits on ECF as vi ewable only by the parties" by June 30, 2023. Dkt. No. 981. While this order remains in effect, the parties are hereby additionally directed to submit these documents to chambers via email by June 23, 2023. The Court understands that this will not require additional work by the parties because they will be exchanging (or have exchanged) these documents with their adversary by that date. Second, while the parties' pre-trial submissions mostly accorded with the Court's February 10, 2023 pretrial order, see Dkt. No. 945, the Court does not believe that it received "short description of the relevant law." Dkt. No. 945 at 2. The parties are directed to file this short description of the relevant law on the docket b y no later than June 30, 2023, and to send that document in native format to chambers via email the same day. Third, the Court requests that the parties provide proposed voir dire questions for the jury. The parties should propose voir dire questions by letter on the docket and submission in native format to chambers by no later than June 30, 2023. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/20/2023) (rro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- X AU NEW HAVEN, LLC, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : -against: : YKK CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendants. : ------------------------------------------------------------- X USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 6/20/2023 1:15-cv-3411-GHW ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: The Court thanks the parties for their submissions in advance of the July 31, 2023 trial. See Dkt. Nos. 982–984. Through this order, the Court requests the filing of several additional documents and alters the deadline for the submission of one set of materials. First, the Court previously ordered the parties to file their “unredacted Daubert moving papers and exhibits, unredacted Daubert opposition papers and exhibits, and unredacted Daubert reply papers and exhibits on ECF as viewable only by the parties” by June 30, 2023. Dkt. No. 981. While this order remains in effect, the parties are hereby additionally directed to submit these documents to chambers via email by June 23, 2023. The Court understands that this will not require additional work by the parties because they will be exchanging (or have exchanged) these documents with their adversary by that date. Second, while the parties’ pre-trial submissions mostly accorded with the Court’s February 10, 2023 pretrial order, see Dkt. No. 945, the Court does not believe that it received “short description of the relevant law.” Dkt. No. 945 at 2. The parties are directed to file this short description of the relevant law on the docket by no later than June 30, 2023, and to send that document in native format to chambers via email the same day. Third, the Court requests that the parties provide proposed voir dire questions for the jury. The parties should propose voir dire questions by letter on the docket and submission in native format to chambers by no later than June 30, 2023. 1 SO ORDERED. Dated: June 20, 2023 New York, New York __________________________________ GREGORY H. WOODS United States District Judge If the either party believes, or the parties agree, that the Court should use the same voir dire questions that were used in the HEO trial, the party(s) should indicate that fact in this letter. 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?