Youngblood v. Pena et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 17 Report and Recommendations. On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff pro se, Andre Youngblood, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 25, 2015, the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. Plaintiff subsequently filed a document entitled "Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order," ECF No. 14, which the Court construes as an application for a preliminary injunction. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R & R"), proposing that Plaintiff's application be denied. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. E.g., Levy v. Young Adult Inst., Inc., 13 Civ. 2861, 2015 WL 170442, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2015). The Court finds n o clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. Plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/10/2015) (ajs)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD,
Plaintiff,

USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATE FILED: g. fro /15

T

I

-against15 Civ. 3541 (AT)(HBP)
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DETECTIVE
LOUIS PENA #6992, OFFICER JESUS
SANCHEZ #5644, C.O. T.J. #19297, ALL
BEING SUED IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND
PERSONAL CAPACITIES,

ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff prose, Andre Youngblood, filed this action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. On June 25, 2015, the Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman.
Plaintiff subsequently filed a document entitled "Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction
and Temporary Restraining Order," ECF No. 14, which the Court construes as an application for
a preliminary injunction.
After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and
Recommendation (the "R & R"), proposing that Plaintiffs application be denied. Despite
notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has
passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R
for clear error. E.g., Levy v. Young Adult Inst., Inc., 13 Civ. 2861, 2015 WL 170442, at *1
(S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2015). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the
R & R in its entirety. Plaintiffs application for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 10, 2015
New York, New York

ANALISA TORRES
United States District Judge