Johnson v. United States of America

Filing 21

ORDER: In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Taylor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the stay of Defendants' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions is lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, by July 26, 2022, the parties shall submit a joint letter proposing next steps and/or a briefing schedule in connection with Defendants' pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/19/2022) Sitting by designation. (ate)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 11-cr-487 (RJS) against GREGORY REED, JOHN JOHNSON, RONNIE GONZALEZ, Defendants. JOHN JOHNSON, Petitioner, No. 15-cv-3956 (RJS) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RONNIE GONZALEZ, Petitioner, No. 16-cv-4184 (RJS) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge: On June 21, 2022, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022), holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(c) does not qualify as a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B). In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Taylor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the stay of Defendants’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions is lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, by July 26, 2022, the parties shall submit a joint letter proposing next steps and/or a briefing schedule in connection with Defendants’ pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitions. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2022 New York, New York RICHARD J. SULLIVAN UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Sitting by Designation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?