Schorr v. Prudenti et al

Filing 23

OPINION: By letter dated September 17, 2015, the prose Plaintiff has requested a written opinion explaining the Court's bench ruling denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 18). In response to hi s motion, the Court set oral argument for noon on September 16, 2015. (See Dkt. No. 19.) Counsel for the Defendants opposing the motion was present at that time when the case was called; the Plaintiff was not. His motion was therefore denied. See Loa dholt v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 13 Civ. 567, 2014 WL 4980977, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 2014) (dismissing case based on failure to appear at a show cause hearing); Graham v. RJM Acquisition LLC, No. 11 Civ. 4682, 2012 WL 1865534, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2012) (same); see also Wacha v. Town of Deerpark, No. 06 Civ. 15531, 2008 WL 2061268, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2008). (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/24/2015) (kgo)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------x
DAVID EVAN SCHORR,
Plaintiff,
15 Civ. 4054(RWS)
- against OPINION

~ ~ f; r'

A. GAIL PRUDENTI, et al.

11

~-~ ·) · . \

'· " " '

if !)(.l,L~~\,;:-~;

Defendants.

=-:=:.-::__""-l:
L
,~

l-~ -~:-,-:·--··----·

'

11

r

I ! r 1 \ 1 i ; ,.. ·..• - r ,-. r\.l r '.
t,·.~~.S-~'-A.'\.,.,.,;J\J,__.i.

----------------------------------------x

Ii
.i.;..
l' j ;;·\I'1/', ·tt.
' .1.~ ;_j\_/.
~-·.,-nr"

"'I •

.if.L

•

,'\t L I-< IlJ:,fJ:

Sweet, D.J.

·------..··

~···-··-·~,_

..

By letter dated September 17, 2015, the prose Plaintiff
has requested a written opinion explaining the Court's bench
ruling denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and
temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 18).

In response to his

motion, the Court set oral argument for noon on September 16,
2015.

(See Dkt. No. 19.)

Counsel for the Defendants opposing

the motion was present at that time when the case was called;
the Plaintiff was not.

His motion was therefore denied.

See

Loadholt v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 13 Civ. 567, 2014 WL
4980977, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. July 21, 2014)

(dismissing case based

on failure to appear at a show cause hearing); Graham v. RJM
Acquisition LLC, No. 11 Civ. 4682, 2012 WL 1865534, at *2
(E.D.N.Y. Apr. 24, 2012)

.

~ - 251 i

--..-

~t

r ·i)j;~1 • •
i

(same); see also Wacha v. Town of

.. ..

.

c

~

Deerpark, No. 06 Civ. 15531, 2008 WL 2061268, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y.

May 9, 2008).

It is so ordered.

New York, NY,1
September Z,,7, 2015