ABC v. DEF

Filing 475

MEMO ENDORSED ORDER on re: 418 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion filed by Omnicare, Inc., CVS Health Corporation denying 387 Motion to Seal; denying 417 Motion to Seal; denying 434 Motion to Seal; denying 444 Motion to Seal. ENDORSEMENT: All pending motions to seal papers filed in support of or in opposition to objections are DENIED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 6/25/24) (yv)

Case 1:15-cv-04179-CM-VF Document 418 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 5

\J_

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ex
rel. URI BASSAN,
Plaintiffs,

r-_A/'-

V.

r

OMNICARE, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 15-CV-4179-CM-VF

0.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

C

7)~

V.

OMNICARE, INC. and CVS HEALTH CORP.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DE~NDANTS'
MOTION TO SEAL REPLY IN SUPPOR.-'YOF OBJECTIONS
E ·n ainigi (pro hac vice)
Holly Conley (pro hac vice)
William Ashworth (pro hac vice)
David Randall J. Riskin (pro hac vice)
Benjamin Hazelwood (Bar No. 5001508)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
680 Maine Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20024
[phone]
For matters in New York:
650 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019

Attorneys for Omnicare, Inc. and CVS Health
Corporation
USDCSDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRO~lCA LLY FILED
DOC#:
r
I .

DATE FILED: -

b_/?Jl~if I

Case 1:15-cv-04179-CM-VF Document 418 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 5

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
DEFENDANTS REQUEST SEALING NOTWITHSTANDING RESERVATIONS .................. 1

1

Consistent with the Court's Individual Practices and Procedures Rule V(D), Defendants are including a Table of Contents and a Table of Authorities.

Case 1:15-cv-04179-CM-VF Document 418 Filed 12/11/23 Page 3 of 5

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
CASES

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............... ............................... 1

11

Case 1:15-cv-04179-CM-VF Document 418 Filed 12/11/23 Page 4 of 5

DEFENDANTS REQUEST SEALING NOTWITHSTANDING RESERVATIONS

Omnicare, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation's (together, "Omnicare") reply in support of
their objections to Judge Figueredo 's October 25, 2023 order (ECF 370) cites to and quotes from
materials the U. S. Attorney's Office has designated confidential under the protective order, and
which Judge Figueredo sealed below. Omnicare disagrees these materials should be sealed-including because they demonstrate the Office's public criticisms of Omnicare's practices are meritless. See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-120 (2d Cir. 2006)
(presumption for public access to judicial documents weighed against "privacy interests of those
resisting disclosure" (internal quotation marks omitted)). But because the protective order contemplates that material designated confidential be maintained under seal, Omnicare seeks sealing
here as to the portions of its reply quoting from (and paraphrasing) confidential material. It has
filed a redacted version of its reply on the public docket, and an unredacted version conditionally
under seal.

1

Case 1:15-cv-04179-CM-VF Document 418 Filed 12/11/23 Page 5 of 5

Dated: December 11 , 2023

Respectfully submitted,

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP

Isl Enu Mainigi
Enu Mainigi (pro hac vice)
Holly Conley (pro hac vice)
William Ashworth (pro hac vice)
David Randall J. Riskin (pro hac vice)
Benjamin Hazelwood (Bar No. 5001508)
680 Maine Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20024
[phone]
For matters in New York:
650 Fifth A venue
Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019

Attorneys for Omnicare, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation

2