De La Rosa LaFontaine v. Mechkowski et al

Filing 20

ORDER: Accordingly, counsel for Petitioner and Respondents are directed to appear before the Court for a status conference on Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 11 a.m. in Courtroom 20-C. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Status Conference set for 3/19/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 20C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John F. Keenan.) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 2/20/2020) (cf)

Download PDF
Case 1:09-md-02013-PAC Document 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------x JACQUELINE DE LA ROSA LAFONTAINE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Petitioner, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x -againstIn re FANNIE MAE 2008 SECURITIES : LITIGATION : SCOTT MECHKOWSKI, CHRISTOPHER : SHANAHAN, JEH JOHNSON, and LORETTA : LYNCH, -----------------------------------------------------------x Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 45 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 02/20/2020 No.Civ. 7831 (PAC) 08 15 Civ. 4251 (JFK) ORDER 09 MD 2013 (PAC) OPINION & ORDER Respondents. -----------------------------------x JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge: HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge: On February 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals BACKGROUND1 for the Second Circuit vacated and remanded the Court's August The early years of this decade saw a boom in home financing which was fueled, among 17, 2015 Opinion & Order, which granted in part and denied in other things, by low interest rates and lax credit conditions. New lending instruments, such as part Petitioner's habeas corpus petition for immediate release subprime mortgages (high credit risk loans) and Alt-A mortgages (low-documentation loans) from detention. kept the boom going. Borrowers played a role too; they took on unmanageable risks on the Accordingly, counsel for Petitioner and Respondents are assumption that the market would continue to rise and that refinancing options would always be directed to appear before the Court for a status conference on available in the future. Lending discipline was lacking in the system. Mortgage originators did Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 11 a.m. in Courtroom 20-C. not hold these high-risk mortgage loans. Rather than carry the rising risk on their books, the SO ORDERED. , r-1/ originators sold their loans into the secondary mortgage market, often as securitized packages Dated: New York, New York ( grew J known as February 20, securities (“MBSs”). MBS markets~ , almost exponentially. mortgage-backed 2020 John F. Keenan United States District But then the housing bubble burst. In 2006, the demand for housing droppedJudge abruptly ~~ and home prices began to fall. In light of the changing housing market, banks modified their lending practices and became unwilling to refinance home mortgages without refinancing. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all references cited as “(¶ _)” or to the “Complaint” are to the Amended Complaint, dated June 22, 2009. For purposes of this Motion, all allegations in the Amended Complaint are taken as true. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?