IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Filing
534
ORDER denying #529 Letter Motion to Compel. Having reviewed the parties' correspondence, including Defendants' reply (Dkt. 533), Defendants' letter motion to compel Plaintiff to produce discovery regarding certain "expert reliance materials" (Dkt. 529) is denied for substantially the reasons set forth in Plaintiff's October 30, 2020 letter (Dkt. 532). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 11/4/2020) Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. (mml)
<![CDATA[
Case 1:15-cv-06549-CM-RWL Document 534 Filed 11/04/20 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER :
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
:
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
11/4/2020
15-CV-6549 (CM) (RWL)
ORDER
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Having reviewed the parties’ correspondence, including Defendants’ reply (Dkt.
533), Defendants’ letter motion to compel Plaintiff to produce discovery regarding certain
“expert reliance materials” (Dkt. 529) is denied for substantially the reasons set forth in
Plaintiff’s October 30, 2020 letter (Dkt. 532).
SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated: November 4, 2020
New York, New York
Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
