Raymond et al v. The City of New York et al

Filing 149

ORDER: Regarding Plaintiffs' request for emails, Defendants' counsel is directed to email Plaintiffs' counsel a list of the search terms, date ranges, and custodians used in their search. Plaintiffs' request is otherwise denied. (As further set forth in this Order.) Based on Defendants' representation that the CPI does not contain information relating to discrimination based on race or national origin, the Court sustains Defendants' objection to Request No. 25, and DENIES Plaintiffs' motion to compel as to Request No. 25. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 11/25/2019) (cf)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EDREWEENE RAYMOND, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
against

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 15 Civ. 6885 (LTS) (SLC)

THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,

ORDER

Defendants.

SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge:
The Court conducted a telephone conference today, November 25, 2019, regarding the
parties’ outstanding discovery disputes, particularly Plaintiffs’ request to compel specific
discovery (ECF No. 148). The Court finds as follows:
(1) Regarding Plaintiffs’ request for emails, Defendants’ counsel is directed to email
Plaintiffs’ counsel a list of the search terms, date ranges, and custodians used in
their search. Plaintiffs’ request is otherwise denied.
(2) Regarding the text messages from Defendants Christopher McCormack and
Constantin Tsachas’ New York City Police Department-provided cell phones, by
Friday, December 6, 2019, Defendants’ counsel is directed provide, on a confidential
basis consistent with the protective order in this action, to Plaintiffs’ counsel the cell
phones’ subscriber, service provider, phone numbers, and an authorization to obtain
phone records from the service provider. Plaintiffs’ request is otherwise denied.
(3) Regarding Plaintiffs’ supplemental set of document requests, dated July 21, 2019,
the only outstanding dispute involves Request No. 25 seeking the Central Personnel

Index (“CPI”) for Andrew Hatki, Jonathan Blatt, Tameika, Goode, and Martine
Materaso. Based on Defendants’ representation that the CPI does not contain
information relating to discrimination based on race or national origin, the Court
sustains Defendants’ objection to Request No. 25, and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to
compel as to Request No. 25.

Dated:

New York, New York
November 25, 2019
SO ORDERED

_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge

2