Raymond et al v. The City of New York et al

Filing 185

ORDER re: 184 Letter, filed by Ritchie Baez, Pedro Serrano, Sandy Gonzalez, Edreweene Raymond. The Court has considered the parties' positions regarding certain discovery issues as set forth in their joint letter (ECF No. 184), and r ules as follows: 1. ESI Search Terms: The City is Ordered to search "Gonzalez" within 25 words of "PC." 2. Deposition of Sergeant Tameika Goode: Plaintiffs may question Sergeant Goode about Plaintiff Ritchie Baez's complaint with the New York Police Department's Office of Equal Employment, and Defendants may reopen Plaintiff Baez's deposition for one hour to ask him about the same complaint. 3. Plaintiffs' March 3, 2020 Document Requests: a. Plaintiffs 9; Request No. 14, for discovery related to "the extensive work the NYPD did as to how their evaluations were faulty following the Floyd Trail" is DENIED as irrelevant. b. Plaintiffs' Requests Nos. 15-17 are DENIED based on Magistrate Judge Pitman's June 21, 2019 Order. c. Plaintiffs' Requests Nos. 20-21 are DENIED as overly broad, disproportional, and irrelevant to the pending claims approved by the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain's June 27, 2018 Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 3/18/2020) (kv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDREWEENE RAYMOND, et al., Plaintiffs, against CIVIL ACTION NO.: 15 Civ. 6885 (LTS) (SLC) THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., ORDER Defendants. SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has considered the parties’ positions regarding certain discovery issues as set forth in their joint letter (ECF No. 184), and rules as follows: 1. ESI Search Terms: The City is Ordered to search “Gonzalez” within 25 words of “PC.” 2. Deposition of Sergeant Tameika Goode: Plaintiffs may question Sergeant Goode about Plaintiff Ritchie Baez’s complaint with the New York Police Department’s Office of Equal Employment, and Defendants may reopen Plaintiff Baez’s deposition for one hour to ask him about the same complaint. 3. Plaintiffs’ March 3, 2020 Document Requests: a. Plaintiffs’ Request No. 14, for discovery related to “the extensive work the NYPD did as to how their evaluations were faulty following the Floyd Trail” is DENIED as irrelevant. b. Plaintiffs’ Requests Nos. 15-17 are DENIED based on Magistrate Judge Pitman’s June 21, 2019 Order. c. Plaintiffs’ Requests Nos. 20-21 are DENIED as overly broad, disproportional, and irrelevant to the pending claims approved by the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain’s June 27, 2018 Order. Dated: New York, New York March 18, 2020 SO ORDERED _________________________ SARAH L. CAVE United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?