Raymond et al v. The City of New York et al

Filing 358

ORDER: Pursuant to the oral argument held today, November 14, 2022 (the "Oral Argument"), the Court orders as follows: 1. By Thursday, November 17, 2022, Plaintiffs shall advise Defendants how they intend to proceed regarding Plaintiff Serr ano's claims under the New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws based on alleged First Amendment retaliation. 2. By Monday, November 21, 2022, Defendants shall file a letter advising the Court whether they are amenable to stipulating t o Plaintiffs' proposed third amended complaint (ECF No. 436-1), and re-opening limited discovery as the Court outlined during the Oral Argument. 3. The parties shall order a transcript of the Oral Argument and file it on the docket. The parties shall complete the annexed transcript request form and submit one request to: [e-mail], by Tuesday, November 15, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 11/14/2022) (ama)

Case 1:15-cv-06885-LTS-SLC Document 358 Filed 11/14/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MARIANNE T. O’TOOLE, SOLELY AS CHAPTER 7
TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF PEDRO SERRANO,
and SANDY GONZALEZ,
Plaintiffs,

-v-

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 15 Civ. 6885 (LTS) (SLC)
ORDER

THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WILLIAM J. BRATTON,
and CHRISTOPHER McCORMACK,
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to the oral argument held today, November 14, 2022 (the “Oral Argument”), the
Court orders as follows:
1. By Thursday, November 17, 2022, Plaintiffs shall advise Defendants how they intend
to proceed regarding Plaintiff Serrano’s claims under the New York State and New
York City Human Rights Laws based on alleged First Amendment retaliation.
2. By Monday, November 21, 2022, Defendants shall file a letter advising the Court
whether they are amenable to stipulating to Plaintiffs’ proposed third amended
complaint (ECF No. 436-1), and re-opening limited discovery as the Court outlined
during the Oral Argument.
3. The parties shall order a transcript of the Oral Argument and file it on the docket. The
parties shall complete the annexed transcript request form and submit one request
to: [e-mail], by Tuesday, November 15, 2022.
Dated:

New York, New York
November 14, 2022

SO ORDERED.
_________________________
SARAH L. CAVE
United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:15-cv-06885-LTS-SLC
Document
358 COURT
Filed 11/14/22 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Request for the production of a transcript from an electronic recording
Send one request per completed form to:

[e-mail]
Transcripts from an electronic record are generated by a Court Approved Transcriber, NOT the Southern
District Court Reporters. The transcript will be delivered to your office and you will be invoiced directly by
the transcriber. Submission of this form constitutes an agreement to pay for the transcription services
described herein. This form should not be submitted for the purpose of obtaining a price estimate.
NOTE: CJA requests require prior approval by submitting an Auth-24 document in the CJA eVoucher
System. If granted, the attorney then submits the etranscripts order form (indicate CJA Request).
Upon notification from the transcriber, the attorney will create a CJA 24 Voucher in the eVoucher system.

Today’s Date:
Case
Caption
DOCKET NUMBER

DATE OF THE HEARING

JUDGE’S NAME

INDICATE SERVICE:
(prices listed are per page)

Daily
$6.66

3 Day
$6.00

7 Day
$5.34

14 Day
$4.68

30 Day
$4.02

Your Name
Firm Name
Address
Zip Code

City, State
Telephone
Number
E-mail
Address
RESET

PRINT

SAVE

EMAIL