The Food Club Corp, et al v. Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.

Filing 98

OPINION & ORDER re: 85 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by The Food Club Corporation, 81 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kuehne + Nagel, Inc. Presently before the Court are the parties' cross summary judgment mot ions. (Dkt. Nos. 81, 85.) The parties have consented to decision of this case by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 53.) The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and concludes that there are genuine disputes of material fact that preclude summary judgment for either party. See, e.g., Cross Commerce Media, Inc. v. Collective, Inc., 841 F.3d 155, 162 (2d Cir. 2016). The summary judgment motions accordingly are DENIED. The Final Pretrial Order is due March 13, 2017. (Pretrial Order due by 3/13/2017.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 2/13/2017) (cla)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------x THE FOOD CLUB CORP., : Plaintiff, : -against- : 15 Civ. 7047 (AJP) OPINION & ORDER : KUEHNE + NAGEL, INC., : Defendant. : --------------------------------------x ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge: Presently before the Court are the parties' cross summary judgment motions. (Dkt. Nos. 81, 85.) The parties have consented to decision of this case by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). (Dkt. No. 53.) The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions and concludes that there are genuine disputes of material fact that preclude summary judgment for either party. See, e.g., Cross Commerce Media, Inc. v. Collective, Inc., 841 F.3d 155, 162 (2d Cir. 2016). The summary judgment motions accordingly are DENIED. The Final Pretrial Order is due March 13, 2017. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York February 13, 2017 ________________________________ Andrew J. Peck United States Magistrate Judge Copies ECF to: All Counsel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?