Stewart v. N.Y.C. Police Dept. et al

Filing 103

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation for 91 Motion for Settlement filed by T. Fischer, R. Henriquez, City of New York, 102 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Francis's characteristically tho rough and well-reasoned report and recommendation denying Defendants' motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendants' motion at ECF No. 91. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/29/2017) (anc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WAYNE STEWART, USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: _________________ DATE FILED: 11/29/2017 Plaintiff, -againstCITY OF NEW YORK, DET. R. HENRIQUEZ #2495, and DET. T. FISCHER, # 7760, 15 Civ. 7652 (AT) (JCF) ORDER Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Having received no objection to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis’s October 20, 2017 report and recommendation, ECF No. 102, the Court reviewed the recommendation and found “no clear error on the face of the record.” Kilani-Hewitt v. Bukszpan, 130 F. Supp. 3d 858, 860 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (quoting Feehan v. Feehan, 2011 WL 497776, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2011)). Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts Judge Francis’s characteristically thorough and wellreasoned report and recommendation denying Defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendants’ motion at ECF No. 91. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 29, 2017 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?