McCalla et al v. City of New York et al

Filing 115

ORDER: At a Rule 16 conference held on February 12, 2020, the Court, at the request of the parties, made a settlement proposal. The proposal included dollar amounts and other terms applicable to each of the six remaining plaintiffs. It was agreed that each side could accept the proposal as to any or all of the remaining plaintiffs. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendants each have advised the Court that they have agreed in principle to the Court's proposal settlements with respect to ea ch of plaintiffs Mc Calla, Dorsainville, Morilla, Patel and Minault ("Settling Plaintiffs"). Defendants and plaintiff Mulzac have not both agreed to the Court's proposal with respect to plaintiff Mulzac. Accordingly, all claims of a ny given individual Settling Plaintiff against all of the defendants are settled subject to the execution of a definitive settling agreement between that Settling Plaintiff and the defendants. The final settlement of the claims of each individual Settling Plaintiff is not contingent upon the final settlement of the claims of any or all of the other Settling Plaintiffs. The case remains set for trial on March 9 and all deadlines and other scheduling events remain unchanged unless and until the case is settled as to all plaintiffs. The trial will proceed on March 9 with respect to any and all plaintiffs whose claims have not been definitively settled. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 2/14/2020) (jca)