SGM Holdings LLC et al v. Andrews et al
Filing 203
ORDER After reviewing the letters submitted with respect to Defendant Karl Schledwitz's request that the Court consider an additional motion for summary judgment (see Dkt. Nos. 200-02), the Court declines to consider the proposed motion for summary judgment. As already explained by the Court once (see Dkt. No. 189 at 2-3), defendant Schledwitz's request amounts to an untimely motion for reconsideration of Judge Crotty's summary judgment decision dated September 25, 2023. Mo tions for reconsideration must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the challenged decision. See Local Civil Rule 6.3. Defendant Schledwitz gives no reason why he should be excused for his failure to move for reconsideration within the period pre scribed by local rule. Defendant Schledwitz has thus fallen far short of showing extraordinary and compelling reasons why the Court should consider successive summary judgment motions, which are generally disfavored. (See Dkt. No. 189 at 3-4.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 5/10/2024) (jca)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
