SGM Holdings LLC et al v. Andrews et al
Filing 67
ORDER: Should Plaintiffs wish to continue seeking disclosure of these materials, the parties are directed to meet and confer concerning: 1. Any available avenues to resolve this discovery dispute without judicial intervention; 2. Should such eff orts fail, a timetable for Defendants to prepare and produce a detailed privilege log that will allow Plaintiffs to meaningfully assess and, where applicable, challenge the asserted justification for non-disclosure of each withheld document; 3. If applicable, a timetable for Plaintiffs' motion to compel to be presented at a pre-motion conference, filed, and briefed-a briefing that would presumably cover the proper privilege law to be applied in this case, the relevant work product standards, and the application of both doctrines to the unique circumstances presented in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/23/2022) (va)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
