Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. v. Goldman Sachs & Co. et al

Filing 171

ORDER: In light of the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 on the Court's operations-as well as the Court's February 2020 revision of its Individual Rules regarding redactions and filing under seal-the Court directs the parties electronically to file under seal unredacted text-searchable versions of all operative submissions relating to: (i) the two motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pending in No. 15 Civ. 8307 (PAE) ("Fujifilm docket"); and (ii) the class cert ification and Daubert motions pending in No. 14 Civ. 3116 (PAE) ("Direct Purchasers docket"). The Court requests that the parties highlight in yellow any information that was redacted in the original filing. In keeping with the parties' ; existing practice, the documents relating to the motions to dismiss should be filed only on the Fujifilm docket, but the documents relating to the class certification and Daubert motions should be filed on both the Direct Purchasers docket and the MDL docket, No. 13 MD 2481 (PAE). The Court requests that the parties re-file the Fujifilm documents by Friday, April 17, 2020, and that the parties re-file the Direct Purchasers documents by Friday, April 24, 2020. The Court wishes all counsel well during these challenging times. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 4/14/2020) (jwh)

Case 1:15-cv-08307-PAE Document 171 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE ALUMINUM WAREHOUSING
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
In re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust
Litigation (Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs),
No. 14-cv-3116-PAE (S.D.N.Y.)

13-md-2481 (PAE)
14-cv-3116 (PAE)
15-cv-8307 (PAE)
ORDER

Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc. v. Goldman
Sachs & Co., No. 15-cv-8307-PAE (S.D.N.Y.)

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
In light of the unprecedented impact of COVID-19 on the Court’s operations—as well as
the Court’s February 2020 revision of its Individual Rules regarding redactions and filing under
seal—the Court directs the parties electronically to file under seal1 unredacted text-searchable
versions of all operative submissions relating to: (i) the two motions to dismiss for lack of
personal jurisdiction pending in No. 15 Civ. 8307 (PAE) (“Fujifilm docket”); and (ii) the class
certification and Daubert motions pending in No. 14 Civ. 3116 (PAE) (“Direct Purchasers
docket”). The Court requests that the parties highlight in yellow any information that was
redacted in the original filing. In keeping with the parties’ existing practice, the documents
relating to the motions to dismiss should be filed only on the Fujifilm docket, but the documents

1

For the avoidance of doubt, the re-filed documents should be accessible by the Court and the
parties only; public and/or redacted versions of the documents have already been filed on the
docket. Each re-filed document should note, in docket text, to which existing docket number it
corresponds.

Case 1:15-cv-08307-PAE Document 171 Filed 04/14/20 Page 2 of 2

relating to the class certification and Daubert motions should be filed on both the Direct
Purchasers docket and the MDL docket, No. 13 MD 2481 (PAE).
The Court requests that the parties re-file the Fujifilm documents by Friday, April 17,
2020, and that the parties re-file the Direct Purchasers documents by Friday, April 24, 2020.
The Court wishes all counsel well during these challenging times.

SO ORDERED.

PaJA.�

____________________________
Paul A. Engelmayer
United States District Judge
Dated: April 14, 2020
New York, New York

2