Nypl v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 593

ORDER with respect to 577 Letter Motion to Seal. By July 17, 2020, Plaintiffs shall file the "appendix that identifies all parties and attorneys of record who should have access to the sealed documents," pursuant to this Court's Individual Rule I.D.3. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/15/2020) (jca)

Download PDF
Case 1:15-cv-09300-LGS Document 593 Filed 07/15/20 Page 1 of 2 ALIOTO LAW FIRM _________________ ONE SANSOME STREET 35TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 ______________ TELEPHONE (415) 434-8900 FACSIMILE (415) 434-9200 By July 17, 2020, Plaintiffs shall file the "appendix that identifies all parties and attorneys of record who should have access to the sealed documents," pursuant to this Court's Individual Rule I.D.3. So Ordered. Dated: July 15, 2020 New York, New York Re: Nypl, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase & Co, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-9300 Dear Judge Schofield: The Nypl Plaintiffs respectfully request approval to file the Joint Letter ordered by the Court to be filed by the parties on or before July 10, 2020. (Dkt. Nos. 571, 576) under seal and in redacted form, pursuant to Rule I.D.3 of Your Honor’s Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases (“Individual Rules”). The Joint Letter contains references to information designated by Defendants as confidential/highly confidential pursuant to the Stipulation and Order of Confidentiality entered by the Court on November 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 249). In accordance with this Court’s Individual Rules, Plaintiffs have provisionally redacted references to material designated as confidential/highly confidential by Defendants. Pursuant to Rule I.D.3 of this Court’s Individual Rules, however, the party “with an interest in confidential treatment bears the burden of persuasion.” Individual Rules, Rule I.D.3. In this case, Defendants, as the parties that made the relevant confidentiality designations, are those with an interest in confidential treatment. Accordingly, Defendants should “promptly file a letter on ECF within two business days in support of the motion,” explaining why they seek to have the joint letter filed in redacted form pursuant to Rule I.D.3 of this Court’s Individual Rules. Plaintiffs further respectfully reserve the right to challenge the Defendants’ confidentiality designations in the future pursuant to Stipulation and Order of Confidentiality. Nevertheless, Plaintiffs submit this letter consistent with the applicable procedures set forth in the Court’s Individual Rules where the filing party is not the party asserting an interest in the confidential treatment of the redacted information. In accordance with Your Honor’s Individual Rules and the Confidentiality Order, the Nypl Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant it permission to file the Joint Letter under seal and in redacted form. Case 1:15-cv-09300-LGS Document 593 Filed 07/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Hon. Lorna G. Schofield July 10, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Respectfully submitted, ALIOTO LAW FIRM By: /s/ Joseph M. Alioto Joseph M. Alioto Attorneys for Plaintiffs and All Others Similarly Situated C: All Counsel by ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?