Karpov, et al. v. Hannigan et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has received the plaintiffs' objections to the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 24. The plaintiffs have submitted, for the first time, additional materials in support of their ap plication for damages. The matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of the additional materials in the first instance in connection with the inquest on damages following the default of the defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b) (3); Trs. Of Metal Polishers Local 8A-281 Funds v. Prestige Restoration and Maint., LLC, 986 F. Supp. 2d 159, 165 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/13/2017) (cf)

lJSDC SONY
DOCU~'!::NT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

L~ECTRON'C-',LL v

f'ILED

DOC#

DA TEF
"""1-LE-D--~-~-~:l.:~~~-~_z_z.~~-=

MARIA KARPOV DMD MS PC, ET AL. ,
Plaintiffs,
- against MYLES HANNIGAN I ET AL.

15-cv-9497
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND ORDER

I

Defendants.

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

The Court has received the plaintiffs' objections to the
report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 24.
The plaintiffs have submitted, for the first time, additional
materials in support of their application for damages.
The matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for
consideration of the additional materials in the first instance
in connection with the inquest on damages following the default
of the defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b) (3); Trs. Of Metal
Polishers Local 8A-281 Funds v. Prestige Restoration and Maint.,
LLC, 986 F. Supp. 2d 159, 165 n.2

(E.D.N.Y. 2013).

SO ORDERED.
Dated:

New York, New York
May 13, 2017
John G. Koeltl
"ted States District Judge