Gambles v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
Filing
194
MEMO ENDORSEMENT with respect to 189 Motion for Attorney Fees. ENDORSEMENT: The parties should be prepared to discuss plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs and the named plaintiff's service award, 0kt. 189, at the final fairness hearing on September 22, 2020 at 2 p.m. If the Court has questions about the motion, it will take them up at that time. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/29/2020) (js)
Case 1:15-cv-09746-PAE Document 188 Filed 07/22/20 Page 1 of 1
194
07/29/20
E. MICHELLE DRAKE SHAREHOLDER
d 612.594.5933 m 612.242.4296 emdrake@bm.net
July 22, 2020
VIA ECF
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer
Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: Gambles v. Sterling, 15-CV-09746 – Request for Oral Argument
Dear Judge Engelmayer,
Pursuant to the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in a Civil Case, Plaintiff
respectfully requests that the Court schedule oral argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for
Attorney’s Fees, Costs and Named Plaintiff Service Award (ECF 184).
Specifically, Plaintiff seeks that the Court consider this motion at the final fairness
hearing scheduled for September 22, 2020 at 2:00 PM. ECF No. 183. As Plaintiff made
clear in his preliminary approval brief, Plaintiff is filing this motion now so that the motion
papers can be posted on the Settlement Website and “that Class Members will have the
opportunity to review them prior to the end of the Objection and Exclusion Period.” ECF
No. 180 at 7.
Oral argument is warranted because, pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2), a hearing is
required for class action settlement approval. The final fairness hearing will also afford
the Court the opportunity to resolve any questions it has regarding the instant motion.
Sincerely,
E. Michelle Drake
SO ORDERED.
__________________________________
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER
United States District Judge
43 SE MAIN STREET, SUITE 505
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414
612.594.5999 BERGERMONTAGUE.COM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?