Edrei et al v. Bratton et al
Filing
131
ORDER: granting 130 Letter Motion to Stay. Application GRANTED. To facilitate settlement discussions, the stay is extended to January 25, 2021. The parties shall advise the Court immediately in the event of a settlement and, in any event, shall submit a status letter no later than January 25, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 130. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/27/2020) (ama)
Case 1:16-cv-01652-JMF Document 131 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
LAW DEPARTMENT
JAMES E. JOHNSON
Corporation Counsel
100 CHURCH STREET
NEW YORK, NY 10007
PETER W. BROCKER
Assistant Corporation Counsel
T (212) 356-2332
F (212) 356-3509
E pbrocker@law.nyc.gov
October 27, 2020
BY ECF:
Hon. Jesse M. Furman, U.S.D.J.
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Anika Edrei, et al. v. City of New York, et al.,
16 Civ. 1652 (JMF) (BCM)
Your Honor:
I am an attorney assigned to the defense of the above referenced matter, and I write
jointly with plaintiffs’ counsel to respectfully request that the Court extend the stay of this matter
for an additional 90 days, from October 27, 2020 to January 25, 2020. This is the parties’ fourth
application for a stay, but the first request to be based solely on the promising settlement
negotiations that have already resulted in an oral agreement resolving the issues of plaintiffs’
damages and claims for equitable relief. This request, if granted, will enable the parties
additional time to reduce the parties’ equitable relief agreements in principle to writing and
attempt to resolve the sole remaining issue, plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
As the Court may recall, in the August 18, 2020 settlement conference, the parties agreed
in principle on an award for plaintiffs’ damages, contingent on the parties’ successfully
negotiating terms regarding equitable relief and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
The parties recently resolved the issue of equitable relief in this matter, and are in the process of
reducing their agreements to a written stipulation. If the Court grants this application, the parties
plan to use the additional time to draft that stipulation and attempt to resolve this final issue of
attorneys’ fees. The requested three-month adjournment is necessary because defendants need
time to analyze plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and then seek appropriate authority, and the parties will
then need additional time to make their best efforts to come to an agreement, if possible, on their
own, before attending a final settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Moses scheduled for
January 11, 2021, if the parties cannot resolve the remaining issues in the case without assistance
from the Court before then. 1
1
For the same reasons the parties sought and were granted an adjournment of the next settlement conference. The
conference had been scheduled for October 20, 2020, but was adjourned to January 11, 2021. See, Dkt. No. 129.
Case 1:16-cv-01652-JMF Document 131 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
Peter W. Brocker /s//
Peter W. Brocker, Esq.
Assistant Corporation Counsel
Application GRANTED. To facilitate settlement discussions, the stay is extended to January 25,
2021. The parties shall advise the Court immediately in the event of a settlement and, in any
event, shall submit a status letter no later than January 25, 2021.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 130.
SO ORDERED.
October 27, 2020
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?