Contrera et al v. Langer et al.

Filing 441

ORDER: The revisions to the Settlement Agreement as proposed (Docket # 440) are approved. The proposed notice process for the New Class Members is also approved. Finally, in light of the fact that there were no objections to the proposed settlement, that any request to speak at the hearing had to be made in advance and there were no requests to speak, that the existing Class Members were informed that the date of the Fairness Hearing could change, that the date of the hearing is being adjourned not advanced, and that the new date of the hearing is posted on the public docket, it is not necessary to provide notice to existing Class Members of the adjournment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 6/09/2021) (ama)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
USVALDO CONTRERA, et al.,
:
:

ORDER

:

16 Civ. 3851 (LTS) (GWG)

Plaintiffs,
-v.:
LEIBEL LEDERMAN, et al.,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------------------------------X
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge
The revisions to the Settlement Agreement as proposed (Docket # 440) are approved.
The proposed notice process for the New Class Members is also approved.
Finally, in light of the fact that there were no objections to the proposed settlement, that
any request to speak at the hearing had to be made in advance and there were no requests to
speak, that the existing Class Members were informed that the date of the Fairness Hearing
could change, that the date of the hearing is being adjourned not advanced, and that the new date
of the hearing is posted on the public docket, it is not necessary to provide notice to existing
Class Members of the adjournment.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 9, 2021
New York, New York