Zhang et al v. Zhang et al

Filing 377

ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons stated at the hearing, enforcement of the Corrected Judgment entered on May 10, 2021, at Dkt. No. 345, is STAYED until further order of the Court. It is further ORDERED that, the parties shall advise the Court within one business day of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Plaintiffs' and Mr. Yan's pending appeal of the sanctions order and Corrected Judgment. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs' and Mr. Yan's motion for emergency injunctive relief is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/29/2022) (mml)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X : MEIDE ZHANG, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : -against: : LIANG ZHANG, et al., : Defendants. : : -------------------------------------------------------------X 16 Civ. 4013 (LGS) ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, a hearing was held in this case on April 29, 2022, on the motion of Plaintiffs and their counsel Mr. Yan for emergency injunctive relief enjoining Defendants and their counsel from seizing certain assets to satisfy the Corrected Judgment against Mr. Yan at Dkt. No. 345 that was entered on May 10, 2021, following an order of sanctions (Dkt. No. 331). It is hereby ORDERED that, for the reasons stated at the hearing, enforcement of the Corrected Judgment entered on May 10, 2021, at Dkt. No. 345, is STAYED until further order of the Court. It is further ORDERED that, the parties shall advise the Court within one business day of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Plaintiffs’ and Mr. Yan’s pending appeal of the sanctions order and Corrected Judgment. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ and Mr. Yan’s motion for emergency injunctive relief is DENIED as moot. Dated: April 29, 2022 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?