Watkins v. The City Of New York , et al

Filing 123

ORDER: On June 3, 2016, Shauntay Watkins brought this action alleging discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Doc. 1. On December 21, 2018, following trial, a jury returned a verdict for Defendant, nding that Watkins had not established by a preponderance of the evidence that she was subjected to a hostile work environment. Doc. 85. On April 16, 2020, the Court denied Watkins' motion for a new trial. Doc. 113. Watkins appealed, and on June 15, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit armed the Court's order. Doc. 115. On August 3, 2021, Watkins moved to appeal the Clerk's taxation of costs. Doc. 121. To date, Defendant has not led any response to Watkins' motion. The Court therefore orders Defendant to respond by November 12, 2021. Failure to do so will result in the appeal being considered unopposed. It is SO ORDERED., ( Responses due by 11/12/2021) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/29/2021) (ama)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHAUNTAY WATKINS, Plaintiff, – against – NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ORDER 16 Civ. 4161 (ER) Defendant. Ramos, D.J.: On June 3, 2016, Shauntay Watkins brought this action alleging discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Doc. 1. On December 21, 2018, following trial, a jury returned a verdict for Defendant, finding that Watkins had not established by a preponderance of the evidence that she was subjected to a hostile work environment. Doc. 85. On April 16, 2020, the Court denied Watkins’ motion for a new trial. Doc. 113. Watkins appealed, and on June 15, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the Court’s order. Doc. 115. On August 3, 2021, Watkins moved to appeal the Clerk’s taxation of costs. Doc. 121. To date, Defendant has not filed any response to Watkins’ motion. �e Court therefore orders Defendant to respond by November 12, 2021. Failure to do so will result in the appeal being considered unopposed. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: October 29, 2021 New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?