Commerzbank AG v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al

Filing 428

ORDER re: 421 LETTER MOTION for Local Rule 37.2 Conference addressed to Judge William H. Pauley, III from Albert J. Rota dated February 8, 2021. filed by U.S. Bank N.A. The parties having appeared for a telephonic pre-motion confere nce on March 3, 2021 regarding the parties' joint letter, (ECF No. 421), this Court enters the following schedule on consent: 1. The parties are directed to meet and confer to seek a resolution that does not necessitate judicial intervention. 2. If the parties fail to resolve the issue, Commerzbank may file a three-page supplemental letter memorandum by March 17, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. 3. U.S. Bank may file a three-page letter memorandum in response by March 19, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. 4. This Court will take the application on submission. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 3/3/2021) (kv)

Download PDF
Case 1:16-cv-04569-WHP Document 428 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMMERZBANK AG, Plaintiff, -againstU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : 16cv4569 ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge: The parties having appeared for a telephonic pre-motion conference on March 3, 2021 regarding the parties’ joint letter, (ECF No. 421), this Court enters the following schedule on consent: 1. The parties are directed to meet and confer to seek a resolution that does not necessitate judicial intervention. 2. If the parties fail to resolve the issue, Commerzbank may file a three-page supplemental letter memorandum by March 17, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. 3. U.S. Bank may file a three-page letter memorandum in response by March 19, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. 4. This Court will take the application on submission. Dated: March 3, 2021 New York, New York

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?