Pavon-Hernandez et al v. Stacca Rest. Corp et al
Filing
75
ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT re: 74 Judgment. Judgment entered in this case (ECF No. 74) is vacated pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court overlooked that the settlement was in an FLSA case. The proposed judgment ( ECF No. 72) will be considered, along with the Court's review of Franco Perez, et al. v. Super Gourmet Food Corp., et al., 16 Civ. 4375 (AKH), in relation to the scope and effect of Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc., 944 F.3d 395 (2d Cir. 2019). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 1/26/21) (yv)
Case 1:16-cv-05045-AKH Document 75 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------- x
:
:
JORGE PAVON-HERNANDEZ, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
:
:
STACCA REST. CORP., et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
--------------------------------------------------------------- x
ORDER VACATING
JUDGMENT
16 Civ. 5045 (AKH)
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.:
Judgment entered in this case (ECF No. 74) is vacated pursuant to Rule 60(a) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court overlooked that the settlement was in an FLSA
case The proposed judgment (ECF No. 72) will be considered, along with the Court’s review of
Franco Perez, et al. v. Super Gourmet Food Corp., et al., 16 Civ. 4375 (AKH), in relation to the
scope and effect of Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc., 944 F.3d 395 (2d Cir. 2019).
SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 26, 2021
New York, New York
___________/s/_____________
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?