Mendez et al v. K & Y Peace Corp. et al
Filing
241
ORDER: By January 10, 2020, Plaintiff Mr. Francisco and his counsel are each directed to file sworn affidavits explaining: (1) the reasons Mr. Francisco was previously unavailable for trial, the subsequent status conference, and the signing of the initial proposed settlement agreement (a timeframe spanning nearly two months); and (2) how Plaintiffs' counsel was able to locate him within a week of the Court's December 18, 2019 Order for purposes of executing the second proposed settlement agreement. No extensions to this deadline will be granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/3/2020) (ras)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
1/3/2020
MIRIAM MENDEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
16-CV-05562 (SN)
ORDER
-againstK&Y PEACE CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge:
On December 11, 2019, the parties submitted a proposed settlement, to which one
plaintiff, Noe Alfredo Francisco Avila (“Mr. Francisco”), was not a signatory. See ECF No. 236.
The Court had previously informed the parties by its December 5, 2019 Order that it would
consider whether to dismiss any non-signatory plaintiffs for failure to prosecute and gave the
parties an opportunity to present their positions on the issue. ECF No. 235. By Order dated
December 18, 2019, the Court ordered the parties to submit a modified agreement by January 3,
2020. ECF No. 239. On December 23, 2019, the parties filed a second proposed settlement
agreement, which is identical to the initial proposed settlement agreement except it includes Mr.
Francisco’s purported signature to execute the agreement. ECF No. 240.
By January 10, 2020, Plaintiff Mr. Francisco and his counsel are each directed to file
sworn affidavits explaining: (1) the reasons Mr. Francisco was previously unavailable for trial,
the subsequent status conference, and the signing of the initial proposed settlement agreement (a
timeframe spanning nearly two months); and (2) how Plaintiffs’ counsel was able to locate him
within a week of the Court’s December 18, 2019 Order for purposes of executing the second
proposed settlement agreement. No extensions to this deadline will be granted.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:
January 3, 2020
New York, New York
cc:
Kwan Chi (by Chambers)
11 Jean Ct.
Old Tappan, NJ 07675
Sun Mi Chi (by Chambers)
11 Jean Ct.
Old Tappan, NJ 07675
Susanne Toes Keane, Esq., limited-scope counsel for Sun Mi Chi – by email
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?