Shim-Larkin v. City of New York
Filing
787
ORDER with respect to 784 Motion for Attorney Fees. On May 10, 2022, this case was referred for General Pretrial, a Report & Recommendation on a Motion for an Award of Expenses, and Report & Recommendations on anticipated motions for summary jud gment. Dkt. No. 786. On May 7, 2022, Plaintiff submitted her motion for an Award of Expenses in accordance with the Order dated September 14, 2020. Dkt. No. 784. If the Defendant would like to challenge the reasonableness of the expenses alleged by Plaintiff, such opposition shall be filed on or before May 25, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 5/11/2022) (tg)
Case 1:16-cv-06099-AT-JW Document 787 Filed 05/11/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
HEEMA SHIM-LARKIN,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
16-CV-6099 (AT) (JW)
-againstCITY OF NEW YORK.
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge:
On May 10, 2022, this case was referred for General Pretrial, a Report & Recommendation
on a Motion for an Award of Expenses, and Report & Recommendations on anticipated motions
for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 786. On May 7, 2022, Plaintiff submitted her motion for an
Award of Expenses in accordance with the Order dated September 14, 2020. Dkt. No. 784. If the
Defendant would like to challenge the reasonableness of the expenses alleged by Plaintiff, such
opposition shall be filed on or before May 25, 2022.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:
New York, New York
May 11, 2022
______________________________
JENNIFER E. WILLIS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?