Shim-Larkin v. City of New York

Filing 793

ORDER: On June 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting clarification of the summary judgment briefing schedule. Dkt. No. 792. For now, this Court will hold to the schedule set forth by Judge Nathan. Should modification be required, the Parties may seek such relief when that becomes clear. The Court will also refrain from scheduling a pre-motion conference until the Parties are ready to proceed with summary judgment. Should the Parties have any discovery disputes requiring interv ention from the Court, they are welcome to file letter motions describing the nature of the disagreement and requesting a conference to resolve any outstanding issues. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 6/7/2022) (tg)

Case 1:16-cv-06099-AT-JW Document 793 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
HEEMA SHIM-LARKIN,
ORDER

Plaintiff,

16-CV-6099 (AT) (JW)

-againstCITY OF NEW YORK.
Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
JENNIFER E. WILLIS, United States Magistrate Judge:

O June 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed a letter requesting clarification of the summary judgment
briefing schedule. Dkt. No. 792. For now, this Court will hold to the schedule set forth by Judge
Nathan. Should modification be required, the Parties may seek such relief when that becomes
clear. The Court will also refrain from scheduling a pre-motion conference until the Parties are
ready to proceed with summary judgment.
Should the Parties have any discovery disputes requiring intervention from the Court, they
are welcome to file letter motions describing the nature of the disagreement and requesting a
conference to resolve any outstanding issues.
SO ORDERED.
DATED:

New York, New York
June 7, 2022
______________________________
JENNIFER E. WILLIS
United States Magistrate Judge