Mayaguez S.A. v. Citigroup Inc. et al
Filing
309
ORDER granting 306 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Application is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/6/2022) (ks)
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 309
306 Filed 07/06/22
07/01/22 Page 1 of 1
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022-6069
+1.212.848.4000
JULY 1, 2022
VIA ECF
Honorable Paul G. Gardephe
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
40 Foley Square, Room 2204
New York, NY 10007
Re:
Mayagüez, S.A. v. Citigroup, Inc. et al., Case No. 16 Civ. 06788 (PGG) (JLC)
Dear Judge Gardephe:
We write on behalf of Defendant to request a short extension of two business days to
Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s motions in limine and two other pre-trial motions
filed by Plaintiff. The current deadline for those responses is Thursday, July 7, 2022 (under
ECF No. 226 and SDNY Local Civil Rule 6.1(b)), and under the requested extension the due
date would be Monday, July 11, 2022. In light of the number of motions at issue (four) and
intervening federal holiday, a two business-day extension would facilitate Defendant’s
preparation of responses. Plaintiff has no objection to this request.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Agnès Dunogué
Adam S. Hakki
Agnès Dunogué
John Nathanson
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel. 212-848-4924
Tel. 212-848-5257
ahakki@shearman.com
agnes.dunogue@shearman.com
john.nathanson@shearman.com
Dated: July 6, 2022
Attorneys for Defendant
ABU DHABI
PARIS
|
|
ROME
BEIJING
|
|
BRUSSELS
SAN FRANCISCO
|
|
DUBAI
SÃO PAULO
|
FRANKFURT
|
SAUDI ARABIA*
|
HONG KONG
|
SHANGHAI
|
|
LONDON
SINGAPORE
|
MENLO PARK
|
TOKYO
|
|
MILAN
TORONTO
|
|
NEW YORK
WASHINGTON, DC
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP IS A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ORGANIZED IN THE UNITED STATES UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, WHICH LAWS LIMIT THE PERSONAL LIABILITY OF PARTNERS.
*ABDULAZIZ ALASSAF & PARTNERS IN ASSOCIATION WITH SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?