Mayaguez S.A. v. Citigroup Inc. et al
Filing
365
ORDER REGARDING DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TRIAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Citibank, N.A., is authorized to use the technological equipment listed in Appendix A for the duration of the trial in the above-capti oned matter scheduled to begin on August 22, 2022 (the "Trial"); and it is further ORDERED that Clinton Lam and Stu Lucero of Impact Trial Consulting, LLC shall be permitted to enter the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 on August 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM to install in Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B, using one or more of the v ehicles listed in that appendix, shall be permitted on Friday, August 19, 2022 to access the Courthouse's freight entrance and deliver to Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that upon completion of the trial, two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B shall be permitted to access Courtroom 705 to remove the installed technological equipment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/18/2022) (ks)
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
MAYAGÜEZ S.A.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
Case No. 16 Civ. 06788 (PGG) (JLC)
CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIGROUP, INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING DELIVERY
AND INSTALLATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TRIAL
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Citibank, N.A., is authorized to use
the technological equipment listed in Appendix A for the duration of the trial in the abovecaptioned matter scheduled to begin on August 22, 2022 (the “Trial”); and it is further
ORDERED that Clinton Lam and Stu Lucero of Impact Trial Consulting, LLC
shall be permitted to enter the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY
10007 on August 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM to install in Courtroom 705 the technological equipment
listed in Appendix A; and it is further
ORDERED that two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on
Appendix B, using one or more of the vehicles listed in that appendix, shall be permitted on
Friday, August 19, 2022 to access the Courthouse’s freight entrance and deliver to
Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further
ORDERED that upon completion of the trial, two of the five Aquipt, Inc.,
employees identified on Appendix B shall be permitted to access Courtroom 705 to remove the
installed technological equipment.
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 2 of 4
Dated: August 18, 2022
New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe
United States District Judge
-2-
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 3 of 4
APPENDIX A
Equipment
Quantity
Small portable folding tech tables
2
Compact library cart
3
22” Monitors
2
Extron HDMI Switch
1
HP Printer and toner
1
Cabling and Wiring (including HDMI wiring, audio wiring, power
strips, and extension cords)
Bulk
Gaffers Tape (for installation of cables and wiring)
Bulk
A-1
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 4 of 4
APPENDIX B
Names of Aquipt, Inc., Employees
(1) Jeremy Coley
(2) Robert Emmett Donahue
(3) Connor John Gibbons
(4) James X Lamar
(5) Joshua Alexander Urofsky
Vehicle Information
Vehicle Type
State of Tag/Plate
Tag/Plate No.
2019 Chevy Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZMZ2828
2017 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZKW3693
2001 ISU NPR (Box Truck)
Pennsylvania
YBR4451
2017 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZJT4462
2005 Honda ELEMENT/LX
Pennsylvania
GCC5346
2006 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
YSD1393
2016 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZHR9612
2017 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZJT4461
2022 Express G2500
Pennsylvania
ZTR4163
2021 Chevrolet Express Cargo Van 2500
Pennsylvania
ZSE4759
B-1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?