Mayaguez S.A. v. Citigroup Inc. et al

Filing 365

ORDER REGARDING DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TRIAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Citibank, N.A., is authorized to use the technological equipment listed in Appendix A for the duration of the trial in the above-capti oned matter scheduled to begin on August 22, 2022 (the "Trial"); and it is further ORDERED that Clinton Lam and Stu Lucero of Impact Trial Consulting, LLC shall be permitted to enter the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 on August 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM to install in Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B, using one or more of the v ehicles listed in that appendix, shall be permitted on Friday, August 19, 2022 to access the Courthouse's freight entrance and deliver to Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that upon completion of the trial, two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B shall be permitted to access Courtroom 705 to remove the installed technological equipment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/18/2022) (ks)

Download PDF
Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MAYAGÜEZ S.A., Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 16 Civ. 06788 (PGG) (JLC) CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIGROUP, INC., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT FOR TRIAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Citibank, N.A., is authorized to use the technological equipment listed in Appendix A for the duration of the trial in the abovecaptioned matter scheduled to begin on August 22, 2022 (the “Trial”); and it is further ORDERED that Clinton Lam and Stu Lucero of Impact Trial Consulting, LLC shall be permitted to enter the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 on August 19, 2022 at 12:00 PM to install in Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B, using one or more of the vehicles listed in that appendix, shall be permitted on Friday, August 19, 2022 to access the Courthouse’s freight entrance and deliver to Courtroom 705 the technological equipment listed in Appendix A; and it is further ORDERED that upon completion of the trial, two of the five Aquipt, Inc., employees identified on Appendix B shall be permitted to access Courtroom 705 to remove the installed technological equipment. Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 2 of 4 Dated: August 18, 2022 New York, New York SO ORDERED: The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe United States District Judge -2- Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 3 of 4 APPENDIX A Equipment Quantity Small portable folding tech tables 2 Compact library cart 3 22” Monitors 2 Extron HDMI Switch 1 HP Printer and toner 1 Cabling and Wiring (including HDMI wiring, audio wiring, power strips, and extension cords) Bulk Gaffers Tape (for installation of cables and wiring) Bulk A-1 Case 1:16-cv-06788-PGG-JLC Document 365 Filed 08/18/22 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX B Names of Aquipt, Inc., Employees (1) Jeremy Coley (2) Robert Emmett Donahue (3) Connor John Gibbons (4) James X Lamar (5) Joshua Alexander Urofsky Vehicle Information Vehicle Type State of Tag/Plate Tag/Plate No. 2019 Chevy Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZMZ2828 2017 Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZKW3693 2001 ISU NPR (Box Truck) Pennsylvania YBR4451 2017 Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZJT4462 2005 Honda ELEMENT/LX Pennsylvania GCC5346 2006 Express G2500 Pennsylvania YSD1393 2016 Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZHR9612 2017 Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZJT4461 2022 Express G2500 Pennsylvania ZTR4163 2021 Chevrolet Express Cargo Van 2500 Pennsylvania ZSE4759 B-1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?