Belabbas v. Inova Software Inc. et al

Filing 244

ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' Consent Letter Motion for Extension of Time, filed on February 10, 2020. (ECF No. 243.) The motion indicates that parties "have agreed in principle to settle all remaining disputes with respect t o the judgment and the Application, and are in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement," and request a 30 day extension of their filing deadlines for opposing Plaintiff's application for fees and costs, altering or amending the judgment, or seeking a new trial. (Id.) Furthermore, the parties indicate that "one discrete (non- substantive) issue remains to be finalized that Plaintiff has been unable to address due to a ser ious personal issue that has kept her out of the country. This is the fourth motion seeking an extension. (See ECF Nos. 233, 238, 241.) Parties indicate in their Consent Letter Motion that there are specific reasons for the continuing request s. (ECF No. 243.) The Court hereby sets a brief Telephonic Hearing on this Motion for Friday, February 14, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. EST, 3:30 p.m. CST, for the limited purpose of discussing the timeline of closing the case, with dial-in information to follow. So Ordered.(Telephone Conference set for 2/14/2020 at 04:30 PM before Judge Jon P McCalla.) (Signed by Judge Jon P McCalla on 2/11/2020) (js)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHERIFA BELABBAS, Plaintiff, v. INOVA SOFTWARE INC., FRITZ EISENHART, in his individual and professional capacities, and GILLES TOULEMONDE, in his individual and professional capacities, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:16-cv-07379-JPM ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC HEARING Before the Court is Defendants’ Consent Letter Motion for Extension of Time, filed on February 10, 2020. (ECF No. 243.) The motion indicates that parties “have agreed in principle to settle all remaining disputes with respect to the judgment and the Application, and are in the process of finalizing a settlement agreement,” and request a 30 day extension of their filing deadlines for opposing Plaintiff’s application for fees and costs, altering or amending the judgment, or seeking a new trial. (Id.) Furthermore, the parties indicate that “one discrete (nonsubstantive) issue remains to be finalized that Plaintiff has been unable to address due to a serious personal issue that has kept her out of the country.” This is the fourth motion seeking an extension. (See ECF Nos. 233, 238, 241.) Parties indicate in their Consent Letter Motion that there are specific reasons for the continuing requests. (ECF No. 243.) The Court hereby sets a brief Telephonic Hearing on this Motion for Friday, February 14, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. EST, 3:30 p.m. CST, for the limited purpose of discussing the timeline of closing the case, with dial-in information to follow. SO ORDERED, this 11th day of February, 2020. /s/ Jon P. McCalla JON P. McCALLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?